Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 11, 1818
The New Hampshire Gazette
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
Editorial criticizes editors of New-York Evening Post and Centinel for opposing the war and government, labeling them as the 'federal faction' that prolonged the conflict and is despised in England, Canada, and the US. Contrasts with respect for republicans shown by British during the war. From Bost. Pat.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
The editor of the New-York Evening Post and of the Centinel, are considerably chagrined at Squire Christie's calling the opposition to the government and the war by their right name, viz. "the federal faction." They say, by way of warding off that "unkindest cut of all," that "had they approved of the war, and lent their cordial heart and hand to have carried it on, Squire Christie's boasted Canada would hardly have opposed a barrier to our arms. We had only to have marched to their shores, and they would have been ours."
Mr. Otis & Co. will hardly thank these editors for a confession that places them and the party of which they were trumpeters in not the most enviable situation. That the Canadian historian is right and that he has given the right name to the disturbers of our peace, and the prolongers of the war, no man can doubt. It is a well known truth, that the "federal faction" is despised in England and Canada, as much as they are execrated in the United States. There is but one mode by which any party can, or ought to acquire influence: and that is by adhering to their country. When they desert this standard, they are viewed with suspicion and contempt even by the enemies of their country. Thus during the late war, the British uniformly evinc ed a higher degree of respect for the republicans, their declared and open enemies, than for the federalists.—Bost. Pat.
Mr. Otis & Co. will hardly thank these editors for a confession that places them and the party of which they were trumpeters in not the most enviable situation. That the Canadian historian is right and that he has given the right name to the disturbers of our peace, and the prolongers of the war, no man can doubt. It is a well known truth, that the "federal faction" is despised in England and Canada, as much as they are execrated in the United States. There is but one mode by which any party can, or ought to acquire influence: and that is by adhering to their country. When they desert this standard, they are viewed with suspicion and contempt even by the enemies of their country. Thus during the late war, the British uniformly evinc ed a higher degree of respect for the republicans, their declared and open enemies, than for the federalists.—Bost. Pat.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
War Or Peace
What keywords are associated?
Federal Faction
War Opposition
Partisan Division
Canada Invasion
British Respect
What entities or persons were involved?
New York Evening Post
Centinel
Squire Christie
Mr. Otis & Co.
Federal Faction
Republicans
British
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Federal Faction For Opposing The War
Stance / Tone
Strongly Anti Federalist And Pro War
Key Figures
New York Evening Post
Centinel
Squire Christie
Mr. Otis & Co.
Federal Faction
Republicans
British
Key Arguments
Opposition To War Labeled As 'Federal Faction'
Federalists' Opposition Prolonged The War And Hindered Success In Canada
Federal Faction Despised In England, Canada, And Us
Parties Gain Influence By Adhering To Country, Not Deserting It
British Respected Republicans More Than Federalists During The War