Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Poem
August 27, 1811
Kentucky Gazette
Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky
What is this article about?
A satirical poem depicting a mock legal trial between the Nose and Eyes over ownership of spectacles, with the Tongue as lawyer and Ear as judge, ultimately ruling in favor of the Nose.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
POETRY.
Report of an Adjudged Case not to be found
in any of the books.
Between Nose and Eyes a strange contest arose,
The spectacles set them unhappily wrong,
The point in dispute was, as all the world knows,
To which the said spectacles ought to be-long.
So the tongue was the lawyer, and argued the cause
With a great deal of skill, and a wig full of learning;
While chief baron Ear sat to balance the laws,
So fam'd for his talent in nicely discerning:
In whose favour the wise solemn nod
That the nose has had spectacles always in wear
Which amounts to possession time out of mind.
Then holding the spectacles up to the court—
Your lordship observes they are made with a straddle
As wide as the ridge of the Nose is; in short,
Design'd to sit close to it, just like a saddle.
Again, would your lordship a moment suppose
('Tis a case that has happen'd, and may be again)
That the visage or countenance had not a Nose
Pray who would or who could wear spectacles then?
On the whole, it appears, and my argument shows
With a reasoning the court will never condemn,
That the spectacles plainly were made for the Nose,
And the nose was as plainly intended for them.
Then shifting his side, as a lawyer knows how,
He pleaded again in behalf of the Eyes:
But what were his arguments few people know,
For the court did not think they were equally wise.
So his lordship decreed, with a grave solemn tone,
Decisive and clear, without one if or but—
That whenever the Nose put his spectacles on,
By daylight or candle-light—Eyes should be shut.
Report of an Adjudged Case not to be found
in any of the books.
Between Nose and Eyes a strange contest arose,
The spectacles set them unhappily wrong,
The point in dispute was, as all the world knows,
To which the said spectacles ought to be-long.
So the tongue was the lawyer, and argued the cause
With a great deal of skill, and a wig full of learning;
While chief baron Ear sat to balance the laws,
So fam'd for his talent in nicely discerning:
In whose favour the wise solemn nod
That the nose has had spectacles always in wear
Which amounts to possession time out of mind.
Then holding the spectacles up to the court—
Your lordship observes they are made with a straddle
As wide as the ridge of the Nose is; in short,
Design'd to sit close to it, just like a saddle.
Again, would your lordship a moment suppose
('Tis a case that has happen'd, and may be again)
That the visage or countenance had not a Nose
Pray who would or who could wear spectacles then?
On the whole, it appears, and my argument shows
With a reasoning the court will never condemn,
That the spectacles plainly were made for the Nose,
And the nose was as plainly intended for them.
Then shifting his side, as a lawyer knows how,
He pleaded again in behalf of the Eyes:
But what were his arguments few people know,
For the court did not think they were equally wise.
So his lordship decreed, with a grave solemn tone,
Decisive and clear, without one if or but—
That whenever the Nose put his spectacles on,
By daylight or candle-light—Eyes should be shut.
What sub-type of article is it?
Satire
What themes does it cover?
Satire Society
What keywords are associated?
Nose Eyes Dispute
Spectacles Trial
Mock Court
Satirical Verse
Tongue Lawyer
Ear Judge
Poem Details
Title
Report Of An Adjudged Case Not To Be Found In Any Of The Books.
Form / Style
Rhymed Couplets
Key Lines
Between Nose And Eyes A Strange Contest Arose,
The Point In Dispute Was, As All The World Knows,
That The Spectacles Plainly Were Made For The Nose,
And The Nose Was As Plainly Intended For Them.
That Whenever The Nose Put His Spectacles On,