Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 23, 1905
Howard Times
Howard, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
This editorial praises philanthropists who persist in doing good despite ingratitude, deception, and abuse from recipients, contrasting them with professional beggars and hard-hearted skeptics. It argues that charity's rewards outweigh the risks of being cheated.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Luxury of Doing Good.
Ingratitude is the meanest of the vices, and its existence is often discouraging to the man who wants to help his kind, but thank heaven, there are people who rise above this feeling of depression, and labor earnestly to succor even the mentally obtuse who do not realize when they are being benefited, and like the beasts, accept a favor without even an impulse of gratefulness. Ay, these ingrates are even worse than the brute creation, for the dog recognizes and loves the hand that feeds him, though there are human beings who sneer at those who afford them eleemosynary comfort and malign those who have tried to relieve them in spite of their laziness and folly.
Those who have labored in philanthropic directions have often been astonished at the deception and double dealing with which they have been met. They have found persons appealing to them for assistance who have snug little bank accounts which they will not touch under any consideration, and when they have refused assistance to petitions coming from such source have been overwhelmed with loud-mouthed abuse in which blasphemy was seldom absent.
Nevertheless, the good work of our charitable organizations goes on. It never ceases. Its angels of mercy always bear in mind that it is better to be a thousand times deceived than to once only wound the breast of truth. And there are private philanthropists who are constantly doing good in spite of all temptations to regard all applicants for aid as imposters. The fact is that those most deserving shrink from the task of asking help and often suffer in silence, while people more brazen beg and beg and beg again with a persistency that shows they are devoid of shame, or even common decency.
The latter are the professional beggars, who are too indolent to attempt to earn an honest living.
The philanthropists whom we refer are often laughed at by the more hard-hearted neighbors who never bestow charity at all, because they pretend to be afraid that they will be cheated, but they are, according to the New York Mail, easily taken in where all kinds of fraudulent schemes which promise quick returns from the investment of a small amount of money are presented. They are, indeed, more often overreached than the man or woman who enjoys the luxury of doing good.—Newport Mercury.
Ingratitude is the meanest of the vices, and its existence is often discouraging to the man who wants to help his kind, but thank heaven, there are people who rise above this feeling of depression, and labor earnestly to succor even the mentally obtuse who do not realize when they are being benefited, and like the beasts, accept a favor without even an impulse of gratefulness. Ay, these ingrates are even worse than the brute creation, for the dog recognizes and loves the hand that feeds him, though there are human beings who sneer at those who afford them eleemosynary comfort and malign those who have tried to relieve them in spite of their laziness and folly.
Those who have labored in philanthropic directions have often been astonished at the deception and double dealing with which they have been met. They have found persons appealing to them for assistance who have snug little bank accounts which they will not touch under any consideration, and when they have refused assistance to petitions coming from such source have been overwhelmed with loud-mouthed abuse in which blasphemy was seldom absent.
Nevertheless, the good work of our charitable organizations goes on. It never ceases. Its angels of mercy always bear in mind that it is better to be a thousand times deceived than to once only wound the breast of truth. And there are private philanthropists who are constantly doing good in spite of all temptations to regard all applicants for aid as imposters. The fact is that those most deserving shrink from the task of asking help and often suffer in silence, while people more brazen beg and beg and beg again with a persistency that shows they are devoid of shame, or even common decency.
The latter are the professional beggars, who are too indolent to attempt to earn an honest living.
The philanthropists whom we refer are often laughed at by the more hard-hearted neighbors who never bestow charity at all, because they pretend to be afraid that they will be cheated, but they are, according to the New York Mail, easily taken in where all kinds of fraudulent schemes which promise quick returns from the investment of a small amount of money are presented. They are, indeed, more often overreached than the man or woman who enjoys the luxury of doing good.—Newport Mercury.
What sub-type of article is it?
Social Reform
Moral Or Religious
What keywords are associated?
Philanthropy
Ingratitude
Charity
Beggars
Deception
Moral Virtue
What entities or persons were involved?
Charitable Organizations
Private Philanthropists
Professional Beggars
New York Mail
Newport Mercury
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Challenges And Virtues Of Philanthropy
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Charitable Giving Despite Ingratitude And Deception
Key Figures
Charitable Organizations
Private Philanthropists
Professional Beggars
New York Mail
Newport Mercury
Key Arguments
Ingratitude Discourages But Does Not Stop True Philanthropists
Ingrates Are Worse Than Animals Who Show Loyalty
Deception Is Common, Including From Those With Hidden Resources
Better To Err On The Side Of Helping Than Risk Harming The Deserving
Deserving Poor Suffer Silently While Brazen Beggars Persist Shamelessly
Hard Hearted Skeptics Are Easily Fooled In Other Ways