Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
The Coalville Times
Coalville, Summit County, Utah
What is this article about?
The U.S. Supreme Court decided the anthracite coal case (Interstate Commerce Commission vs. Baird) in favor of the commission on Monday, reversing the U.S. circuit court's decision. The case, brought by W.R. Hearst of New York, alleged discrimination by railroads serving Pennsylvania anthracite mines.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
The case of the Interstate Commerce Commission vs. Baird, commonly known as the anthracite coal case, was decided by the supreme court of the United States Monday in favor of the contentions of the commission, the decision of the United States circuit court for the southern district of New York being reversed. This is the case instituted before the commission by W. R. Hearst of New York, who alleged discrimination by the railroad companies which reached the anthracite coal mines in Pennsylvania.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
New York
Event Date
Monday
Key Persons
Outcome
supreme court reversed the u.s. circuit court decision for the southern district of new york, favoring the interstate commerce commission's contentions.
Event Details
The Interstate Commerce Commission vs. Baird case, known as the anthracite coal case, was instituted by W. R. Hearst of New York alleging discrimination by railroad companies reaching anthracite coal mines in Pennsylvania. The Supreme Court of the United States decided in favor of the commission.