Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 5, 1834
The Daily Cincinnati Republican, And Commercial Register
Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio
What is this article about?
This editorial satirically critiques the notion of 'great men' like Daniel Webster, arguing that true greatness belongs to those certain of success, such as craftsmen, unlike lawyers who admit uncertainty in outcomes. Signed by N. H. Examiner.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Truly Great Men.—The world is full of what are termed "Great Men." The individual who can, on certain occasions, perhaps once or twice in a year, utter "great swelling words," is straightway baptised a "great man." We would not be thought singular, yet with all humility we must beg to dissent from public opinion on this subject.
Take any "great" man—for instance Daniel Webster—he is a lawyer. You have a case in court—you employ him as your counsel—you desire his opinion as to the result—you ask him if he can gain your case—he tells you "it is uncertain." You ask why it is uncertain—your cause is good—it is founded upon the immutable principles of eternal justice—then why is the result uncertain? Does truth ever change?
Ask a carpenter if he can build a house; a tailor if he can make a coat, and they will not tell you "it is uncertain." Why should there be any more uncertainty upon a point of law, than in making a pair of shoes? We come to the conclusion that he who is certain of an end when he employs the means, is a greater man than he who depends upon chance and contingency for the result." Therefore my shoemaker is a greater man than Daniel Webster.—N. H. Examiner.
Take any "great" man—for instance Daniel Webster—he is a lawyer. You have a case in court—you employ him as your counsel—you desire his opinion as to the result—you ask him if he can gain your case—he tells you "it is uncertain." You ask why it is uncertain—your cause is good—it is founded upon the immutable principles of eternal justice—then why is the result uncertain? Does truth ever change?
Ask a carpenter if he can build a house; a tailor if he can make a coat, and they will not tell you "it is uncertain." Why should there be any more uncertainty upon a point of law, than in making a pair of shoes? We come to the conclusion that he who is certain of an end when he employs the means, is a greater man than he who depends upon chance and contingency for the result." Therefore my shoemaker is a greater man than Daniel Webster.—N. H. Examiner.
What sub-type of article is it?
Satire
Moral Or Religious
What keywords are associated?
Great Men
Daniel Webster
Certainty
Lawyers
Craftsmen
Satire
What entities or persons were involved?
Daniel Webster
N. H. Examiner
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Redefining True Greatness Through Certainty In Work
Stance / Tone
Satirical Critique Of Conventional Great Men
Key Figures
Daniel Webster
N. H. Examiner
Key Arguments
Conventional 'Great Men' Are Overhyped For Occasional Grand Speeches
Lawyers Like Webster Admit Uncertainty In Just Cases, Unlike Immutable Truth
Craftsmen Like Carpenters And Shoemakers Are Certain Of Success When Using Proper Means
True Greatness Is Certainty Of Outcome, Not Dependence On Chance