Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe New Hampshire Gazette
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
In Portsmouth on April 16, 1760, the newspaper printer justifies publishing against a person's character to denounce Michael Conner for spreading false news about the King of Prussia defeating Count Daun's army, claiming it from a recent London print. Offers $5 reward for his capture and delivery to the town whipper, citing moral and communal harm.
OCR Quality
Full Text
A Reward of Five DOLLARS
Now lodged in the Hands of the Printer, for any Person or Persons that will bring into this Town, in Six Months from this Date, and deliver into the Hands of the Town Whipper, Michael Conner, a Fellow, who in passing thro' this Town last Saturday, in his Way to the Eastward, did wilfully Report for News, "That the KING of Prussia had kill'd Count Daun, and entirely defeated his whole Army, having destroyed 28,000 on the Field, and taken 19,000 Prisoners." And to confirm the same, did declare again and again at different Times to many of the principal Gentlemen of this Place, "That he had not only read the said News in a London Print last Thursday Evening, which was bro't by a Vessel belonging to Mr. Hughes, which had just arrived at Boston in 27 Days from London, but he had been on board the said Vessel and spoke with the Captain that Evening, who confirm'd all the agreeable News (as he said) he had read in a London Print that was bro't in said Ship." When he pass'd thro' this Town, he had on a red Waistcoat and a Pair of Velvet Breeches; and was a most notorious Liar: His Dress he may change, but for his Faculty in Lying he will always be remarkable.
Nota Bene; There is the Stocks ready, A Pump handy, and Eggs in great Plenty.
Portsmouth, April 16, 1760.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Denunciation Of False News Reporter Michael Conner
Stance / Tone
Strong Moral Condemnation And Call For Punishment
Key Figures
Key Arguments