Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 20, 1951
Seward Seaport Record
Seward, Alaska
What is this article about?
The Freeport (Ohio) Press editorial denounces the U.S. foreign policy under President Truman as a hoax of bi-partisanship, citing Truman's rejection of isolationism and criticizing figures like Acheson, Jessup, Lattimore, Frankfurter, and Hiss for controlling it with Republican stooges.
Clipping
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
John M. Coleman
Mildred Kirkpatrick
Subscription rates
Freeport (Ohio) Press (Rep.) says:
BI-PARTISAN FOREIGN POLICY IS HOAX
We would like to make one point about the Foreign Policy of the United States clear.
It is not, despite what our letter-writing President might say to the contrary, a Bi-Partisan policy.
This came out clearer than ever from the lips of the President himself. Harry Truman commenting on former President Hoover's speech told newsmen that the U. S. is not returning to isolationism, and that they could be sure of that.
Does this sound like a good Bi-Partisan comment?
Editor and Publisher
Managing Editor
75c per month, $8 per year
It reflects exactly the same attitude that is being carried on in regard to foreign policy the ideas of the Acheson-Jessup-Lattimore-Frankfurter-Truman clan. Perhaps we should have included Mr. Alger Hiss. Dean Acheson's buddy. However, he is temporarily out of the government now, spending his time in prison for perjury.
To date there has been no true Bi-Partisan policy. To our knowledge there has not been one remote little item that has been truly Bi-Partisan.
Our foreign policy is called by that name because the administration has succeeded in placing a few Republicans who are stooges for the administration.
Mildred Kirkpatrick
Subscription rates
Freeport (Ohio) Press (Rep.) says:
BI-PARTISAN FOREIGN POLICY IS HOAX
We would like to make one point about the Foreign Policy of the United States clear.
It is not, despite what our letter-writing President might say to the contrary, a Bi-Partisan policy.
This came out clearer than ever from the lips of the President himself. Harry Truman commenting on former President Hoover's speech told newsmen that the U. S. is not returning to isolationism, and that they could be sure of that.
Does this sound like a good Bi-Partisan comment?
Editor and Publisher
Managing Editor
75c per month, $8 per year
It reflects exactly the same attitude that is being carried on in regard to foreign policy the ideas of the Acheson-Jessup-Lattimore-Frankfurter-Truman clan. Perhaps we should have included Mr. Alger Hiss. Dean Acheson's buddy. However, he is temporarily out of the government now, spending his time in prison for perjury.
To date there has been no true Bi-Partisan policy. To our knowledge there has not been one remote little item that has been truly Bi-Partisan.
Our foreign policy is called by that name because the administration has succeeded in placing a few Republicans who are stooges for the administration.
What sub-type of article is it?
Foreign Affairs
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Bi Partisan Foreign Policy
Truman Administration
Isolationism
Alger Hiss
Republican Stooges
Acheson Group
What entities or persons were involved?
Harry Truman
Herbert Hoover
Dean Acheson
Philip Jessup
Owen Lattimore
Felix Frankfurter
Alger Hiss
Freeport (Ohio) Press
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Bi Partisan Foreign Policy Hoax Under Truman
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical And Accusatory
Key Figures
Harry Truman
Herbert Hoover
Dean Acheson
Philip Jessup
Owen Lattimore
Felix Frankfurter
Alger Hiss
Freeport (Ohio) Press
Key Arguments
U.S. Foreign Policy Is Not Bi Partisan Despite Claims
Truman's Comment On Hoover's Speech Rejects Isolationism Unilaterally
Policy Reflects Ideas Of Acheson Jessup Lattimore Frankfurter Truman Group
Alger Hiss, Acheson's Associate, Imprisoned For Perjury
No True Bi Partisan Items To Date
Republicans In Policy Are Administration Stooges