Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeRepublican Herald
Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
Editorial defends Governor Fenner's opposition to merging Pawtucket turnpike roads, which preserved state revenue of $5000 annually for free schools, benefiting Providence by $600. It accuses candidates Lemuel H. Arnold and James F. Simmons of self-interested petitioning that would have enriched stockholders at public expense.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Freemen, we ask you, who was friendly to the Town and to the State in this matter, Governor Fenner or Mr. Arnold? Mr. James F. Simmons, who is stockholder in one of the roads to Pawtucket, was also a petitioner and copartner with Mr. Arnold in the speculation, and the town of Johnston would have lost the proportion to which she is entitled, had the petition been granted. It will be recollected Mr. Arnold was a representative from this Town, and was sent to the General Assembly to protect the interests of the Town-instead of which, he was signer of a petition for himself, which, had it been granted, would have taken money out of the pockets of his constituents and placed in his own. And after all this, Mr. Arnold requests you will make him Governor, and Mr. Simmons wishes to be a representative-- modest men to say the least of them.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Governor Fenner's Opposition To Pawtucket Road Merger
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Governor Fenner And Critical Of Arnold And Simmons
Key Figures
Key Arguments