Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Republican Herald
Editorial April 16, 1831

Republican Herald

Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island

What is this article about?

Editorial defends Governor Fenner's opposition to merging Pawtucket turnpike roads, which preserved state revenue of $5000 annually for free schools, benefiting Providence by $600. It accuses candidates Lemuel H. Arnold and James F. Simmons of self-interested petitioning that would have enriched stockholders at public expense.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The opposition have asserted and repeated it over and often, that Governor Fenner is unfriendly to this town. Let us examine this assertion. It seems Mr. Lemuel H. Arnold was one of the petitioners for a junction of the turnpike roads to Pawtucket, and it further appears, that he was a large stockholder, and consequently deeply interested in the granting of the petition, Had the petition been granted,- the Old Road, which by its charter had reverted to the State, would, by merging with the new road, have been forever lost to the State. The Old Road will now produce to the State an income of Five Thousand Dollars a year. The present annual allowance for Free Schools is Ten Thousand Dollars and the proportion to the Town of Providence is $1200; the revenue from the Old Road to Pawtucket, if applied to Free Schools, would be Six Hundred Dollars additional. The opposition made by Governor Fenner to the junction of the two roads, will furnish the State with an annual revenue of 5000, and this town with its proportion 600, while Mr. Arnold, legislating upon his own petition, would have put this Five Thousand Dollars into the pockets of the Stockholders, of whom he was one.

Freemen, we ask you, who was friendly to the Town and to the State in this matter, Governor Fenner or Mr. Arnold? Mr. James F. Simmons, who is stockholder in one of the roads to Pawtucket, was also a petitioner and copartner with Mr. Arnold in the speculation, and the town of Johnston would have lost the proportion to which she is entitled, had the petition been granted. It will be recollected Mr. Arnold was a representative from this Town, and was sent to the General Assembly to protect the interests of the Town-instead of which, he was signer of a petition for himself, which, had it been granted, would have taken money out of the pockets of his constituents and placed in his own. And after all this, Mr. Arnold requests you will make him Governor, and Mr. Simmons wishes to be a representative-- modest men to say the least of them.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Infrastructure

What keywords are associated?

Governor Fenner Lemuel H Arnold James F Simmons Pawlucket Roads Turnpike Merger State Revenue Free Schools Partisan Criticism

What entities or persons were involved?

Governor Fenner Mr. Lemuel H. Arnold Mr. James F. Simmons Town Of Providence State Town Of Johnston

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Governor Fenner's Opposition To Pawtucket Road Merger

Stance / Tone

Strongly Supportive Of Governor Fenner And Critical Of Arnold And Simmons

Key Figures

Governor Fenner Mr. Lemuel H. Arnold Mr. James F. Simmons Town Of Providence State Town Of Johnston

Key Arguments

Governor Fenner's Opposition Preserved State Revenue Of $5000 Annually From Old Road Revenue Would Fund Free Schools, Adding $600 To Providence Arnold And Simmons Petitioned For Merger As Stockholders, Seeking Personal Gain Merger Would Have Lost Public Road To Private Interests Arnold Failed To Protect Town Interests As Representative Criticizes Arnold's Gubernatorial Bid And Simmons' Representative Bid

Are you sure?