Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 4, 1922
The Athena Press
Athena, Umatilla County, Oregon
What is this article about?
Editorial criticizes Republican-led high tariff legislation as unnecessary and partisan, benefiting protected interests over farmers and workers. Argues for non-partisan commission; notes GOP's bid to moneyed classes despite mass dissatisfaction and voting power.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The report from Washington that republican congressmen have found themselves embarrassed by the tariff debate, is not surprising. The republicans are in fact said to feel little enthusiasm over the new tariff, although forced to defend it. No tariff legislation, at least of such far-reaching magnitude and consequences, was needed at this time, and none should have been undertaken. The whole problem—which in its essence is an economical and not a party problem—should have been left to a non-partisan commission. The democratic congressmen knew this and the republicans are finding it out. The high tariff now under consideration makes no appeal except to class interest, and alienates mass support. Both the farmers and the workingmen are quite well aware that it will be of little material benefit to them, while it will increase the fortunes already swollen of protected interests. It remains to be seen whether these interests will be able to insure retention of control by the republican party in spite of general mass dissatisfaction over conditions as they now exist and as they are likely to exist, despite the new tariff. The G.O.P. has made its bid to the moneyed interests and not to the common people. The latter, however, have the votes.
What sub-type of article is it?
Economic Policy
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Tariff Debate
Republican Policy
High Tariff
Non Partisan Commission
Protected Interests
Farmers
Workingmen
Partisan Politics
What entities or persons were involved?
Republican Congressmen
Democratic Congressmen
G.O.P.
Farmers
Workingmen
Protected Interests
Moneyed Interests
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Republican High Tariff Policy
Stance / Tone
Critical Of High Tariff And Republican Strategy, Supportive Of Non Partisan Approach And Mass Interests
Key Figures
Republican Congressmen
Democratic Congressmen
G.O.P.
Farmers
Workingmen
Protected Interests
Moneyed Interests
Key Arguments
Republicans Embarrassed And Unenthusiastic About Defending New Tariff
No Need For Far Reaching Tariff Legislation At This Time
Tariff Issue Is Economic, Not Partisan; Should Be Handled By Non Partisan Commission
High Tariff Appeals Only To Class Interests, Alienates Mass Support
Farmers And Workingmen See Little Benefit, While Protected Interests Gain
Gop Bids To Moneyed Interests, Not Common People, Despite Voters' Power