Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Phenix Gazette
Story February 18, 1833

Phenix Gazette

Alexandria, Virginia

What is this article about?

Mr. Rives delivers an eloquent speech in the US Senate refuting the doctrine of nullification, establishing his reputation as a capable senator from Virginia, despite some weak passages on the President. The speech is applauded by the audience.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

MR. RIVES' SPEECH.

We do not know how the eloquent and able speech of Mr. Rives may suit the professed politicians at Richmond, but we are certain, that with some exceptions, it will be applauded & commended by the people of Virginia. The effort of Mr. Rives, at once established his reputation as a Senator of ability & competent in every way to represent the ancient Commonwealth, by which he has been so much honored. There are some things which we wish he had not said—there were passages in reference to the President which we thought were weak—but take it as a whole, the speech was one that did great honor to his talents. His refutation of the doctrine of nullification was complete, and he indignantly repudiated it as not being constitutionally sound in any one sense. Mr. Rives spoke to a full Senate and a crowded audience, and the conviction was universal, that the new Senator had made his debut under the most flattering circumstances, and with every thing in his favor.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Personal Triumph

What themes does it cover?

Triumph Justice

What keywords are associated?

Rives Speech Nullification Refutation Senate Debut Virginia Senator

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Rives The President

Where did it happen?

Us Senate

Story Details

Key Persons

Mr. Rives The President

Location

Us Senate

Story Details

Mr. Rives' inaugural Senate speech refutes nullification doctrine completely, earning widespread acclaim and solidifying his reputation as an able representative of Virginia, though some references to the President are critiqued.

Are you sure?