Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Evening Capital
Story February 22, 1896

Evening Capital

Annapolis, Anne Arundel County, Maryland

What is this article about?

Judge Neville dismissed a criminal libel suit by the St. Louis school board president against a newspaper's city editor, upholding the press's right to criticize public officials without malice. The Washington Star praises this as proper, noting officials often view their positions as personal property beyond scrutiny.

Clipping

OCR Quality

97% Excellent

Full Text

Judge Neville did the righteous and proper thing, says the Washington Star, when he dismissed the criminal libel suit brought by the president of the St. Louis school board against the city editor of a St. Louis newspaper. The court held that it was the privilege of a newspaper to criticise a public official, provided, of course, that the criticism was not based upon personal malice. To this decision no exception will be taken except by officials who have been or are being or are likely to be criticised; for it is one of the strange things of to-day that when a man ceases to be a purely private citizen and achieves official position he almost invariably arrives, by a short cut, at the conclusion that the office with which he is temporarily associated is his own property and that his official actions should be entirely above and beyond the reach of those "ghouls of the press" who so frequently insist upon the asking of most inconvenient questions in the public behalf.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Crime Story

What themes does it cover?

Justice Moral Virtue

What keywords are associated?

Libel Suit Press Criticism Public Officials Court Dismissal Washington Star

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Neville

Where did it happen?

St. Louis

Story Details

Key Persons

Judge Neville

Location

St. Louis

Story Details

Judge Neville dismissed the libel suit against the newspaper editor for criticizing the school board president, ruling that newspapers may critique public officials absent personal malice. Commentary highlights officials' tendency to see their roles as untouchable property.

Are you sure?