Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
June 27, 1832
Vandalia Whig And Illinois Intelligencer
Vandalia, Fayette County, Illinois
What is this article about?
The Whig newspaper defends its correction of the Advocate's erroneous claim that state executive officers were absent, noting the Advocate's implicit admission of the error and refusing further debate to avoid personal disputes.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
In our paper of the 13th, we took the liberty to correct a slight mistake into which the Advocate had fallen, in saying that the executive officers of the state government were all absent from their places. In the last number of that paper, the editor greets us with a flaming article of a column's length by way of reply, in which we are accused-gravely accused-of intimating that he had made a false statement, and of charging him with the enormous crime of being mistaken. We have no disposition to enter into a long and profitless discussion with our neighbor of the Advocate, in which, as we infer from his last article, "private griefs" are to form the principal topics; yet we must be allowed to say, that if anything appears in the statement we made in the Whig of the 13th, intimating that the Advocate's remarks were not conformable to fact, it must remain unchanged. The statement we then made is correct- perfectly so; and this we would proceed to show did not the plain admission of its correctness by the same gentleman who complains of us for making it, render such labor, and any further notice of this subject, wholly unnecessary.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Press Freedom
What keywords are associated?
Newspaper Dispute
Factual Correction
State Officers
Press Accuracy
Editorial Reply
What entities or persons were involved?
Advocate
Whig
Executive Officers Of The State Government
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Against Rival Newspaper's Accusation Of Falsehood
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Dismissive
Key Figures
Advocate
Whig
Executive Officers Of The State Government
Key Arguments
The Whig's Correction Of The Advocate's Mistake Was Accurate
The Advocate's Reply Accuses The Whig Of Implying Falsehood Unnecessarily
The Whig Declines Prolonged Debate To Avoid Personal Topics
The Advocate's Own Words Admit The Correctness Of The Whig's Statement