Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette
Story May 26, 1835

The New Hampshire Gazette

Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

A puzzling turnpike toll dispute in London: William Crawley charged by toll collector Charles Naylor for not paying for a second cart attached to another, drawn by one horse. Magistrates debate interpretations of the law before convicting Crawley in costs.

Clipping

OCR Quality

97% Excellent

Full Text

A Puzzler.--A singular case relating to the Turnpike law, was lately brought before the Highgate petty Sessions in London--and which appeared to perplex the worthy magistrates not a little. William Crawley was summoned by Charles Naylor, the Collector of the tolls at the Whistone gate, and was charged with having refused to pay the toll for a cart which was attached to another, drawn by one horse. A long and learned discussion took place between the magistrates upon this knotty question. One said that if the case was decided against the defendant, a common dog-cart tied to a wagon would be liable; another thought the extra cart should only be considered as a part of the luggage; while one of the sapient judicial functionaries was of opinion that two two-wheeled carriages were equal to one four-wheeled one, and that the case came under the clause of "any horse drawing any cart," and it had been proved that the defendant's horse had drawn both. The defendant was finally convicted in the costs.

What sub-type of article is it?

Curiosity Mystery

What themes does it cover?

Justice

What keywords are associated?

Turnpike Toll Legal Dispute Magistrates Debate Cart Attachment Toll Evasion

What entities or persons were involved?

William Crawley Charles Naylor

Where did it happen?

Highgate Petty Sessions In London, Whistone Gate

Story Details

Key Persons

William Crawley Charles Naylor

Location

Highgate Petty Sessions In London, Whistone Gate

Event Date

Lately

Story Details

William Crawley summoned for refusing toll on attached cart drawn by one horse; magistrates debate law interpretations including comparisons to dog-carts and wheeled carriages; convicted in costs.

Are you sure?