Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeAlexandria Advertiser And Commercial Intelligencer
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
A subscriber responds to Mr. Longden's accusations of falsehood in a prior letter, defends the original claims about political rights and actions, criticizes prejudice and flattery, and offers to substantiate details on proceedings involving refractory individuals and a colonel.
OCR Quality
Full Text
PERMIT me to trouble you with a few lines in reply to Mr. Longden.. As he has thought proper to term the communication Signed "A Subscriber," an "address to the citizens," and to charge the author with falsehood, and a great deal I cannot comprehend, to which I cannot pretend to reply at present, as I wish to give it a general investigation. Sure it was a treacherous action, to exculpate those refractory fellows from unmerited contempt, because they have offended you, refusing to become the passive animal of a nincompoop. As to your continental adventures, anecdotes, and tory hunts I should like to be acquainted with them, and whether you marched in van or rear. This would be entertaining, being new-- as none of the American Biographers have done you the justice of handing down your fame, For how is it you take credit to yourself on this score, and refuse it to those whose services are imprinted on the hearts of their countrymen, those whose bodies bear testimony of their exertions-? As to the rights of man and all that, they are oftener expressed than respected; but to their rights, and not their wrongs, I can tell you I am as great a friend as you are. yet not a thorough going democrat- I can "give the devil his due:" That is, give to every man, whatever his prejudices may be, credit for a good action flowing from worthy motives; and although a man may differ from me in his opinion of men, in the line of their conduct, I am not hardy enough to charge him with baseness, toryism, &c: but this is the general resort of prejudice, the bug-bear standard. I will ask the gentleman wherein "Subscriber" was guilty of falsehood? I request him to point out the particular iota. I presume it will be in my power to substantiate what I have advanced, and what appears so grating to the gentleman's feelings. by detailing the proceedings through all their windings. I am possessed of the materials, and were I a "Hudibras," I should reap the advantages, as I am confident it would surpass the precious (rights of man) militia bill. To conclude, let me tell the gentleman, had he always been as ready to publish what he has wrote, he would not now be the confidant and eulogist of the Colonel--But, oh! flattery.. oh! vanity, sweet baits, what cannot thou accomplish.
A SUBSCRIBER.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Letter to Editor Details
Author
A Subscriber
Recipient
Mr. Snowden
Main Argument
the author defends the prior 'subscriber' letter against mr. longden's charges of falsehood, asserts support for the rights of man without being a full democrat, criticizes prejudice and flattery, and offers to substantiate claims about proceedings involving refractory individuals and a colonel.
Notable Details