Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Columbus Democrat
Editorial March 31, 1849

Columbus Democrat

Columbus, Lowndes County, Mississippi

What is this article about?

This editorial critiques the portrayal of General Taylor as a 'second Washington,' contrasting their military backgrounds, presidencies, and characters, arguing the comparison is a failure and profanation.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

"THE SECOND WASHINGTON."

It is always fatal to excite public expectation by exaggerated promises. It is far easier to keep people by surprise, than to realize their extravagant hopes. Hence we conceive that the attempt to make of Gen. Taylor a second Washington will be the saddest failure of our day.

The following contrast between the dead patriot and the living imitator, which we copy from the Lady's Atlas, shows what a difficult task Gen. Taylor has imposed upon himself, in trying to emulate Washington.

The people so far from being misled by these flatteries of parasites, are only recalled to a fuller realization of the contrast between the real greatness of the past and these petty imitations.

There can be no recurrence here to the circumstances that created or called for and developed a great revolutionary commander and president. Gen. Taylor is least of all such a man.

Gen. Washington was not a professional soldier.

Gen. Taylor was through life.

Gen. Washington voluntarily resigned his post at the close of the war. Gen. Taylor held on to its salaries and emoluments to the last moment.

Gen. Washington was the unanimous choice of the people for president. Gen. Taylor received that office against the voice of a majority of the people and the electoral votes of half the States.

Gen. Washington did not profess neutrality or indifference as to the politics of the people of his time, for the only division was Whig and Tory. But in placing Jefferson and Hamilton, the great intellects of the age, in his cabinet, he rose above the sectarianism of party. Gen. Taylor has professed indifference and ignorance upon all the subjects which have occupied the public mind for forty years, and has called to his aid a mere partizan cabinet of second-rate men.

The first took the responsibility of organizing a great government. The second refuses the ordinary accountability of a chief magistrate, and makes his cabinet responsible for his acts.

The difference is as wide between the first president and his last successor, as the circumstances have differed in which they lived, and as their personal and private characters are widely apart; and it is a profanation in his followers to attempt to robe their chief with the mantle of his great predecessor, and a folly for him to attempt to strut awkwardly in its folds.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Gen Taylor Gen Washington Presidential Comparison Political Criticism Whig Party Cabinet Choices

What entities or persons were involved?

Gen. Washington Gen. Taylor Jefferson Hamilton

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Critique Of Comparing Gen. Taylor To Washington

Stance / Tone

Critical Of Gen. Taylor And His Supporters

Key Figures

Gen. Washington Gen. Taylor Jefferson Hamilton

Key Arguments

Attempt To Make Gen. Taylor A Second Washington Is A Failure Washington Was Not A Professional Soldier, Unlike Taylor Washington Resigned Post Voluntarily, Taylor Clung To Salary Washington Unanimously Elected, Taylor Against Majority Washington Rose Above Party By Choosing Jefferson And Hamilton, Taylor Indifferent And Chose Partisan Cabinet Washington Took Responsibility, Taylor Shifts To Cabinet Comparison Profanes Washington's Legacy

Are you sure?