Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Independent Press
Abbeville, Abbeville County, South Carolina
What is this article about?
The late election in Kansas Territory favored the pro-slavery candidate by a thousand votes majority. Reports suggest Missourians did not significantly influence the vote; instead, most settlers supported policies allowing slavery to attract labor and improve the territory.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The Washington correspondent of the Charleston Courier, in a late letter, makes the following paragraph in reference to the election in Kansas Territory:
The late election in the Territory of Kansas resulted in favor of the pro-slavery candidate by a majority of a thousand votes. It is attempted to account for this by the allegation that persons from Missouri in large numbers went over to the territory for the purpose of voting. But this aid was wholly unnecessary, and was not, to any extent, afforded. The fact is that a majority of the settlers, though not slaveholders, being desirous for the improvement of the territory, would not take such a course as would exclude slaveholders, and they were of course desirous also of introducing all the labor that could be obtained from any source.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Kansas Territory
Event Date
The Late Election
Outcome
pro-slavery candidate won by a majority of a thousand votes
Event Details
Election in Kansas Territory resulted in favor of pro-slavery candidate. Allegations of Missouri voters influencing the outcome are dismissed as unnecessary; majority of settlers, though not slaveholders, supported allowing slavery to improve territory and attract labor.