Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Evening Telegraph
Story November 19, 1866

The Evening Telegraph

Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

What is this article about?

An editorial criticizes 'The Age' newspaper for defending opposition to impartial suffrage as principle, arguing it is actually indefensible racial prejudice against reason and justice.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Not Principle, but Prejudice.

The Age seeks to steady itself against the
impartial-suffrage blasts that are now sweep-
ing through the Democratic organization, by
assuming the virtue of not abandoning prin-
ciple. But "principle," in the sense in which
it is used by our contemporary, is something
which has its root in reason. It would puzzle
any one, we think, to show what ground of
principle there is in basing the elective fran-
chise upon the color of a man's skin. Why
not as well upon the color of his eyes, or his
hair, or upon his height, or his weight, avoirdupois? It is not a man's physical accidents
that vote, but the personality—the thinking,
choosing, reasoning, immortal being. What
the Age calls its "principle" is nothing more
than an absurd prejudice, utterly indefensible
at the bar of reason, and at war with the
plainest dictates of justice.

What sub-type of article is it?

Editorial Political Argument

What themes does it cover?

Justice Moral Virtue Deception

What keywords are associated?

Impartial Suffrage Racial Prejudice Voting Franchise Democratic Organization Principle Vs Prejudice

What entities or persons were involved?

The Age

Story Details

Key Persons

The Age

Story Details

Critique of 'The Age' for labeling racial exclusion in suffrage as principle rather than prejudice, arguing it lacks rational basis and violates justice.

Are you sure?