Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeImperial Valley Press
El Centro, Imperial County, California
What is this article about?
California's reapportionment debates involve Los Angeles and San Francisco delegations negotiating over assembly seats, with a compromise proposal affecting Kern County and unchanged congressional redistricting including new districts for San Diego and other counties.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The Los Angeles delegation called a special meeting for late this afternoon. San Francisco is trying to keep eight of its present nine assemblymen, instead of being cut to seven under the bill of Frederick Houser, reapportionment chairman, which comes up for hearing tonight.
A "compromise" maneuver would throw San Francisco's votes behind Los Angeles demands on all phases of reapportionment if only one assemblyman is removed. Loser would be Kern county, which is scheduled to get a second assemblyman under the existing Houser bill.
Proposed congressional reapportionment would be unchanged under the compromise.
Under tentative congressional redistricting, changes would include creation of San Diego county as a separate district and joinder of Imperial, Riverside and Orange counties into another district.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
California
Key Persons
Outcome
san francisco seeks to retain eight assemblymen instead of seven; compromise would support los angeles demands but cost kern county a second assemblyman; congressional redistricting unchanged, creating san diego district and combining imperial, riverside, orange counties.
Event Details
Los Angeles delegation calls special meeting for late afternoon. San Francisco resists cut from nine to seven assemblymen under Houser bill, up for hearing tonight. Compromise: San Francisco backs Los Angeles on reapportionment if only one seat removed; Kern County loses second assemblyman. Congressional plan unchanged.