Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 2, 1789
Gazette Of The United States
New York, New York County, New York
What is this article about?
A correspondent critiques the disparity in diplomatic titles: the US uses grandiose titles for foreign monarchs, but they address President Washington merely as 'Mr. George Washington.' The piece satirizes this as humiliating to American pride, questioning if force is needed for respect and noting the costs of wars.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
A CORRESPONDENT observes, that "The first magistrate of our nation, when he gives a letter of Credence to the King of France, must give him the title of His Most Christian Majesty, with a long string of others: But when the King of France gives an Ambassador a Letter of Credence to the first magistrate of our nation, he must call him Le Sieur George Washington, President of the United States. An American Credence to Holland must be directed to Their High Mightiness The Lords The States General of the United Netherlands: But a Dutch Credence must be directed, Tot den Heer George Washington, President of the United States. Our Credences to Spain must be directed to His Most Catholic Majesty: Spanish Credences to America, must be directed to -- El Señor George Washington, President of the United States. This is American patriotism and national pride, is it? American Credences to England must be directed to His Most Excellent or His Most Sacred Majesty, —British Credences to us, must be directed to Mr. George Washington, President of the United States."
This distinction must be known not only at courts, but by the nations—by the officers, soldiers and seamen of their armies and navies. How many drubbings must you give them before they will respect Mr. as much as Majesty. If titular distinctions have any influence, at all, upon human ears, methinks these are somewhat humiliating to the brave, daring and intrepid sons of American liberty. That we can chastise all the nations of the earth if they affront us, to be sure cannot be doubted: But what shall we do with the debts and taxes, that will become necessary to this purpose?—Most men who hate honors, love money.
This distinction must be known not only at courts, but by the nations—by the officers, soldiers and seamen of their armies and navies. How many drubbings must you give them before they will respect Mr. as much as Majesty. If titular distinctions have any influence, at all, upon human ears, methinks these are somewhat humiliating to the brave, daring and intrepid sons of American liberty. That we can chastise all the nations of the earth if they affront us, to be sure cannot be doubted: But what shall we do with the debts and taxes, that will become necessary to this purpose?—Most men who hate honors, love money.
What sub-type of article is it?
Foreign Affairs
Satire
What keywords are associated?
Diplomatic Titles
Letters Of Credence
American Pride
National Humiliation
Foreign Monarchs
What entities or persons were involved?
George Washington
King Of France
States General Of The United Netherlands
King Of Spain
King Of England
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Disparity In Diplomatic Titles For Us President Versus Foreign Monarchs
Stance / Tone
Satirical Critique Of American Diplomatic Humility
Key Figures
George Washington
King Of France
States General Of The United Netherlands
King Of Spain
King Of England
Key Arguments
Us Uses Exalted Titles For Foreign Rulers In Letters Of Credence
Foreign Rulers Address Us President As 'Mr. George Washington' Or Equivalents
This Disparity Humiliates American Liberty And Pride
Respect May Require Military Force Against Nations
Such Actions Would Lead To Burdensome Debts And Taxes