Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeAlexandria Gazette
Alexandria, Alexandria County, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
Joseph Taylor, a Thompsonian practitioner, defends his treatment of John Harris, who died from bowel inflammation following a relapse of ague and fever. He details the patient's history, symptoms, administered herbal remedies, and criticizes the intervention by a traditional doctor and the biased coroner's inquest that blamed Thompsonian medicine.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Thursday morning, about 10 o'clock, Mr. Harris again sent for me. I then, agreeably to promise, visited him to administer the Thompsonian medicines. On examination found the following symptoms.. Sensible lassitude—want of appetite—sickness of the stomach—slight chills alternating with flushes of heat— stools resembling the washings of meat and were highly fetid a fixed and burning pain which increased by pressure upon the abdomen—very thirsty—skin dry and hot—short laborious breathing, with frequent retching— tongue red on the edge with a dry brownish coat in the centre—the knees frequently raised in order to remove the pressure of the bed clothes.
These were the symptoms of Mr. Harris disease at the time of my visit to administer medicines, which disease I pronounced inflammation of the bowels and treated accordingly.
TREATMENT BEFORE 12 O'CLOCK.—First. I gave him 1 gill of tea composed of Bayberry, Cayenne. and Umbel. Two minutes after an enema composed of the same ingredients with 1 tea spoon Lobelia, 1 tea spoon No. 6. Ten minutes after, 1 gill of Lobelia tea which relieved him of his retching. Ten minutes after, 1 gill of Lobelia tea which produced slight emesis, I then gave a tea cup full of Spearmint tea which caused the nausea to subside. I next applied a cataplasm to the abdomen composed of Slippery Elm. Cracker, and Ginger.
TREATMENT AFTER 12 O'CLOCK. First, an enema composed of warm water, Bayberry, Cayenne, Umbel, Slippery Elm, No 6 and 1 tea sp. Lobelia. I next applied a hot brick to his feet, I then gave him 1 gill of stimulating tea ingredients 1 tea spoon Bayberry, 1 do! Cayenne 1 do of Umbil. do of Lobelia, 7 do. of Sugar, to 1 quart of boiling water. At this stage of the treatment's. through the alarm of the family who were unacquainted with, and utterly opposed to Thompsonianism—Dr P. was sent for, unknown either to the patient or myself No sooner had the said M. D., made his appearance, and simply applied his finger to the pulse of Mr. H., than he proceeded at once, to charge me with having poisoned him" This was without any enquiry into the nature and circumstances of the disease, or the nature and amount of medicines I had administered.
Thus was the further administration of my medicines cut short. During the few hours that Mr. Harris was in my hands. I treated him in strict accordance with the principles of the Thompsonian practice, and I have no doubt -had not my treatment been thus cut short in the midst of the course, and a physician of the opposite practice called—but that the deceased would have been restored to health. if his case was within the reach of remedies of any kind whatever.
In further justice to the public and myself, I will now present briefly, the properties of the several medicines which were used. Lobelia inflata. Muscular relaxant, antiasthmatic sialogogue, and general secretant, through relaxation. Its effects are followed by reaction of the stomach and chest. or emesis. Umbel, or Valerian, Nervine and bitter tonic.— Capsicum, Annum, Cayenne. A pure stimulant, Ginger, the same—of course secretant and tonic. Spearmint, Antspasmodic and Nervine, Bayberry Stimulant, deobstruent, and astringent, Slippery Elm, emollient, Number Six. Detergent, antiseptic. and tonic. [See Curtis' Obstetrics on pages 157, 158, 159, 160 ]
The public may have observed, as I have, a notice in the Baltimore Clipper in which the death of Mr Harris was charged upon the undue use of Thompsonian medicines. through the mal-practice of Joseph Taylor. I should like to know how any man, with the facts of the case before him, could come to any such conclusion. But were all these facts candidly brought out before the jury of inquest? Was the person most of all interested in the decision, called before the jury that all the evidence and facts, pro and con might be presented? If not, was there a post mortem ex. amination by competent men, that the facts might, in this way be fairly made known? To all these questions let me say to the jury, and to an honest public. No
'The main evidence in the case was the opinions of two M D's. Now one of the said practitioners may be fairly supposed to have some interest in placing the death of Mr Har. ris on the Thompsonian practice, and myself.— Query. Why was there not a full investigation? Query again. Why was not the deceased opened? Query again. Was the M D., afraid to unveil the effects of mineral poisons taken by Mr. H. at various periods under the direction of the old practice. Query again. Was Dr P. fearful of finding some of his own noxious drugs in the stomach of the deceased? What ever may have been the reasons, it is to be presumed he did not assign them.either to the jury or any one else. The public must judge.
JOSEPH TAYLOR, T B. P.
oct 7—11
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Letter to Editor Details
Author
Joseph Taylor, T B. P.
Main Argument
joseph taylor defends his thompsonian treatment of john harris's bowel inflammation as proper and effective, arguing that the patient's death resulted from interrupted care by a traditional doctor and a biased inquest that unfairly blamed alternative medicine without full investigation.
Notable Details