Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Miami Labor Citizen
Editorial March 19, 1953

Miami Labor Citizen

Miami, Dade County, Florida

What is this article about?

A Congressman explains challenges of blockading Communist China to end the Korean War, noting limited impact on Soviet land imports, sea trade from Ceylon, Pakistan, and India, reduced Hong Kong trade from prior bill, need to blockade additional ports risking WW3, and preference for UN-approved embargoes.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Dear Neighbor:

Your Congressman was asked the other day his opinion on imposing a blockade of Communist China.

If a blockade of Red China would end the Korean War, I would certainly enthusiastically support such a move.

But here are some of the problems involved. Very few strategic war materials are coming into Red China today through its seaports. Direct military support for the Chinese Communists comes from Russian factories across the Trans-Siberian Railroad.

It is estimated that the Chinese Reds are getting about 75 per cent of their imports, including war materials, from Soviets. The remaining 25 per cent of their imports comes from across the seas, but not from Russia. So, a naval blockade would not affect three-fourths of Red China's imports.

In the first six months of 1952, Ceylon shipped 12 and one-half million dollars worth of rubber to Communist China. Pakistan shipped 54 million dollars worth of cotton and India sold five million dollars worth of jute to the Red Chinese. Other than Russia, these countries are the three largest exporters to Communist China.

If the United States, acting by itself in blockading China, were to cut off this trade those three countries would blame us for their economic crisis.

As a result of the bill that I introduced two years ago which was aimed at reducing the free world's trade with Red China, the trade passing through Hong Kong dropped off considerably.

In 1951—over 280 million dollars worth of trade went to Communist China through Hong Kong. In the first six months of 1952, this volume of trade dropped to 29 million dollars and consisted of shipments from various countries, such as sulphate of ammonia to be used for fertilizer and paper which were the two largest imports.

No blockade of Red China would be successful unless we not only blockaded Hong Kong but the Russian controlled ports of Port Arthur and Dairen because shipments would merely be diverted to those ports. Fear that this might lead to World War 3 is one of the reasons for extreme caution in approaching this problem.

Most observers seem to feel that the United States will make a renewed effort to strike at the Reds through embargoes and that approval of the United Nations will be sought before a naval blockade is undertaken.

What sub-type of article is it?

Foreign Affairs War Or Peace

What keywords are associated?

China Blockade Korean War Communist Imports Soviet Support Hong Kong Trade Un Embargo

What entities or persons were involved?

Communist China United States Soviets Ceylon Pakistan India Hong Kong Port Arthur Dairen United Nations

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Problems With Blockading Communist China

Stance / Tone

Cautious Support Conditional On Ending Korean War But Highlighting Risks

Key Figures

Communist China United States Soviets Ceylon Pakistan India Hong Kong Port Arthur Dairen United Nations

Key Arguments

Blockade Would Not Affect 75% Of Imports From Soviets Via Land 25% Sea Imports Mainly From Ceylon Rubber, Pakistan Cotton, India Jute Unilateral Us Blockade Would Cause Economic Blame From Those Countries Prior Bill Reduced Hong Kong Trade From 280m In 1951 To 29m In 1952 H1 Successful Blockade Requires Including Hong Kong And Russian Ports, Risking Ww3 Us Likely To Pursue Embargoes With Un Approval Instead

Are you sure?