When was it published?

December 9, 1893 in Arizona Silver Belt

Domestic News December 9, 1893

Arizona Silver Belt

Q: What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Baker, Judge Rouse, Walker

Q: What keywords are associated?

Writ Of Prohibition, Judge Baker, Judge Rouse, Walker Case, Florence Tribune

Globe, Miami, Gila County, Arizona

View full issue View on Library of Congress PDF Page 2

What is this article about?

The Florence Tribune discusses a writ of prohibition issued by Judge Baker denying Judge Rouse the right to try the Walker case, questioning its authority and noting it may reflect poorly on Rouse.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Speaking of the writ of prohibition issued by Judge Baker denying Judge Rouse the privilege of trying the Walker case, the Florence Tribune says: It is not clear what effect the writ will have unless Judge Rouse should choose to obey it, which he is not bound to do. Judge Baker has no more authority to issue such a writ than either of the other Associate Justices, and Judge Rouse is not bound by it, unless he should choose to be. By some the issuing of this writ is looked upon as a reflection on Judge Rouse.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Writ Of Prohibition Judge Baker Judge Rouse Walker Case Florence Tribune

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Baker Judge Rouse Walker

Where did it happen?

Florence

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Florence

Key Persons

Judge Baker Judge Rouse Walker

Outcome

the writ's effect is unclear unless judge rouse chooses to obey it; he is not bound by it. some view the issuance as a reflection on judge rouse.

Event Details

Speaking of the writ of prohibition issued by Judge Baker denying Judge Rouse the privilege of trying the Walker case, the Florence Tribune says: It is not clear what effect the writ will have unless Judge Rouse should choose to obey it, which he is not bound to do. Judge Baker has no more authority to issue such a writ than either of the other Associate Justices, and Judge Rouse is not bound by it, unless he should choose to be. By some the issuing of this writ is looked upon as a reflection on Judge Rouse.