Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 2, 1843
The Daily Madisonian
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
The Concord Freeman defends its approval of Mr. Henshaw's appointment, denying any appeal to private benevolence by Henshaw or Greene, and reaffirming belief in his character against The Globe's criticism.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
The Globe says, "There are a parcel of kind-hearted democratic editors, who, having their private benevolence appealed to, and being assured (by Mr. Henshaw himself, probably—at all events, by his adjunct of the Post, Mr. Greene) that he only took the place 'to subserve the cause of the true democracy,' were willing to give him a good word." As one of the 'parcel' of democratic editors who have approved of Mr. Henshaw's appointment, we can truly say that our "private benevolence" was never appealed to by any one on the subject. We heard of Mr. Henshaw's appointment before we saw it announced in any paper, and our article was written before we had read the remarks of any other person on that appointment. With Mr. Henshaw we have never had any conversation or correspondence on the matter. About a week after our article had been published, we had a few minutes conversation with Colonel Greene, but he stated to us no facts with which we were not previously acquainted. He made no appeal to our "private benevolence." We gave Mr. Henshaw our "good word," because we believed him to be a good man, and the attacks of a thousand Globes will never shake that opinion.—Concord Freeman.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Henshaw Appointment
Democratic Editors
Globe Criticism
Private Benevolence
Concord Freeman
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Henshaw
Mr. Greene
Colonel Greene
The Globe
Concord Freeman
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Mr. Henshaw's Appointment Approval
Stance / Tone
Defensive Support For Henshaw
Key Figures
Mr. Henshaw
Mr. Greene
Colonel Greene
The Globe
Concord Freeman
Key Arguments
Private Benevolence Was Never Appealed To
Approval Based On Prior Knowledge And Belief In Henshaw's Goodness
No Conversation Or Correspondence With Henshaw
Conversation With Greene Provided No New Facts Or Appeals
Attacks From The Globe Will Not Change Opinion