Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 21, 1845
Richmond Palladium
Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana
What is this article about?
Editorial criticizes the Locofocos of Union County for nominating William Watt, a supporter of the internal improvements system that bankrupted the state, highlighting hypocrisy given their past denunciations of it and figures like C.B. Smith.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Locos of Union.
The last number of the Jeffersonian contains the proceedings of the late convention of the locos of Union County. The editor in speaking of it, says "the convention acted very judiciously in its nominations. Surely the people of Union can safely trust their legislative interests in the hands of such men as Watt and Orsborne. We feel in our very bones that they will be elected." Well this is a fair endorsement of William Watt, as a candidate for the Legislature, and it is at the same time a most emphatic endorsement of the great exploded system of internal improvement. Mr. Watt was a member of the legislature which created the system; and no man in this county has been more bitter in his denunciations of that same system and those who voted for it than has the editor who now so handsomely compliments Mr. Watt, one of its most ardent supporters and advocates. For years have the locos of this and Union County denounced Mr. C. B. Smith for his connection with the system, and now they have nominated a man for re-election, who not only voted for it, but was most active in securing its passage. We find no fault with Mr. Watt for his vote, but we only wish to remind the locos that they can "surely trust their legislative interests in the hands of Mr. Watt," who voted for a measure which has bankrupted the state, ground the people down into the dust by excessive burdens of taxation, from which they will never escape.
Mr. Watt was one of the "Hen And Chicken" politicians of internal improvement days—a "whole-hog man" in every sense of the word, and the convention now acted "very judiciously" in nominating him. Where is David Hoover? Let him look at this. Dare he open his mouth in condemnation? We shall see.
The last number of the Jeffersonian contains the proceedings of the late convention of the locos of Union County. The editor in speaking of it, says "the convention acted very judiciously in its nominations. Surely the people of Union can safely trust their legislative interests in the hands of such men as Watt and Orsborne. We feel in our very bones that they will be elected." Well this is a fair endorsement of William Watt, as a candidate for the Legislature, and it is at the same time a most emphatic endorsement of the great exploded system of internal improvement. Mr. Watt was a member of the legislature which created the system; and no man in this county has been more bitter in his denunciations of that same system and those who voted for it than has the editor who now so handsomely compliments Mr. Watt, one of its most ardent supporters and advocates. For years have the locos of this and Union County denounced Mr. C. B. Smith for his connection with the system, and now they have nominated a man for re-election, who not only voted for it, but was most active in securing its passage. We find no fault with Mr. Watt for his vote, but we only wish to remind the locos that they can "surely trust their legislative interests in the hands of Mr. Watt," who voted for a measure which has bankrupted the state, ground the people down into the dust by excessive burdens of taxation, from which they will never escape.
Mr. Watt was one of the "Hen And Chicken" politicians of internal improvement days—a "whole-hog man" in every sense of the word, and the convention now acted "very judiciously" in nominating him. Where is David Hoover? Let him look at this. Dare he open his mouth in condemnation? We shall see.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Economic Policy
Infrastructure
What keywords are associated?
Locofocos
Union County
Internal Improvements
William Watt
Hypocrisy
Taxation
Legislature Nomination
What entities or persons were involved?
William Watt
Orsborne
Jeffersonian Editor
C. B. Smith
David Hoover
Locos Of Union County
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Locofoco Nomination Of William Watt For Legislature
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical Of Locofoco Hypocrisy
Key Figures
William Watt
Orsborne
Jeffersonian Editor
C. B. Smith
David Hoover
Locos Of Union County
Key Arguments
Convention's Nomination Of Watt Endorses The Internal Improvements System
Jeffersonian Editor Hypocritically Praises Watt Despite Past Denunciations
Locofocos Previously Criticized C.B. Smith For Supporting The System
Watt Actively Supported The System That Bankrupted The State And Imposed Heavy Taxation
No Fault With Watt's Vote But Reminder Of Its Consequences
Watt Was A 'Whole Hog' Supporter Of Internal Improvements