Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Daily Record
Story July 22, 1952

The Daily Record

Dunn, Harnett County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

At the 1952 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, liberal forces impose a loyalty rule to ensure Southern delegations support the ticket and prevent a repeat of the 1948 Dixiecrat bolt. Southern states protest, with leaders like Gov. Talmadge threatening to defy or leave the party.

Merged-components note: Continuation of story on Democratic convention loyalty rule and Southern delegations; second component relabeled from domestic_news to story as it fits narrative article.

Clippings

1 of 2

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Dixie Delegates Dare Northern Foes To Throw Them Out Of The Convention

Leftwingers Shove Loyalty Rule To Humiliate South

CHICAGO, (UP) --The credentials committee went to work today enforcing a new "Loyalist rule the Democratic national convention shoved down the throats of conservative Southerners.

Chairmen of every state delegation were ordered to "give assurance" that every delegation wil work to have the convention's presidential ticket listed on November ballots "under the heading, name or designation of the Democratic Party."

TRYING TO AVOID BOLT

The idea is to prevent Southern Democrats from bolting the party and running their own presidential candidate under the Democratic label as the "Dixiecrats" did in 1948.

The credentials committee was called into session at 10 a.m. CDT by chairman Calvin Rawlings of Salt Lake City.

Five Southern states-Mississippi Louisiana, Virginia. South Carolina and Georgia - held morning caucuses to determine whether to comply with the loyalty pledge or invite the dominant liberal wing to have them out of the convention. Leaders of all five protested they could not subscribe to the rule without violating their own state laws.

There was a chance the Southern delegations might just ignore the "loyalty" rule and renew the whole fight when the credentials committee reports to the convention tonight. Gov. Herman Talmadge of Georgia said that under convention rules a two-thirds vote is required (Continued On Page Two)
Leftwingers
(Continued from page one)
to expel a delegate who does not comply with a rule.

PLENTY OF DRAMA
The new rule was adopted at a drama-packed, marathon convention session lasting until 2:05 a.m. CDT, today.
Texas and Mississippi "regular" anti-administration delegations were primary targets. But Texas voted in an extraordinary caucus to go along with the rule.
Sen. Blair Moody of Michigan was the principal architect of the rule, stuck into temporary operating procedures of the convention in form of an amendment.
It was rewritten and revised often, and Texas' Gov. Allan Shivers scored the South's only victory when he succeeded in having stricken, before the rule was formally submitted, a sentence stating:
"Every delegate assumes a moral obligation to support the nominees of these convention and to bring about their election."
Shivers also spared the Southerners another humiliation by beating Moody to another punch. He announced Texas and Mississippi voluntarily surrendered any claim to vote on their contest with rival "loyalist" delegations until they are finally seated.
That maneuver forced Moody to strike out a "fair play" proviso of his resolution, which would have deprived the Texas and Mississippi regulars of voting rights until the contests are settled.

DENOUNCED BY TALMADGE
Talmadge angrily denounced the convention's action and said repeatedly that his delegation could not comply with the provision "even if we wanted to."
It is apparent that this is an effort to destroy the Democratic party and turn our nation over to the CIO, ADA, NAACP and all the other leftist, radical elements that would destroy our constitutional government," he said.
Govs. James F. Byrnes of South Carolina, Robert F. Kennon of Louisiana and Hugh White of Mississippi had no comment on the convention's action but immediately called meetings of their delegations.
Gov. John S. Battle of Virginia said he did not know whether his state's delegates "are going to sign that pledge."
"We'll do a little talking," he said. "We'll be guided by the wishes of our members."
Sen. Spessard Holland (D-Fla.), who led the fight against the "loyalty" rules, announced that the Florida delegation would also meet today. But he said "not any of us has a disposition to bolt." He did not say whether the delegates would sign the pledge.
Talmadge, Byrnes and White have openly hinted their states might bolt the party in November if the platform and candidates seem unacceptable to the South.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice Misfortune Survival

What keywords are associated?

Democratic Convention Loyalty Pledge Southern Delegates Dixiecrats Political Bolt Credentials Committee

What entities or persons were involved?

Herman Talmadge Allan Shivers Blair Moody James F. Byrnes Robert F. Kennon Hugh White John S. Battle Spessard Holland Calvin Rawlings

Where did it happen?

Chicago

Story Details

Key Persons

Herman Talmadge Allan Shivers Blair Moody James F. Byrnes Robert F. Kennon Hugh White John S. Battle Spessard Holland Calvin Rawlings

Location

Chicago

Story Details

The Democratic National Convention's credentials committee enforces a new loyalty rule requiring state delegations to assure support for the presidential ticket under the Democratic label, aiming to prevent Southern bolting like in 1948. Southern states including Mississippi, Louisiana, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia protest, holding caucuses to decide compliance, with leaders like Gov. Talmadge denouncing it and hinting at potential party bolt if platform and candidates are unacceptable.

Are you sure?