Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Arkansas Advocate
Editorial June 19, 1835

The Arkansas Advocate

Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas

What is this article about?

An editorial critiques a pro-slavery argument by 'Arkansas' in the Times, refuting claims that the Missouri Compromise guarantees slavery in Arkansas Territory south of 36°30' N latitude, arguing it is a one-sided prohibition that could extend northward.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The following is an extract from the communication of a writer in the last Times, signed Arkansas, against State Government:

I asserted that the Missouri Question could never recur in the councils of the confederacy—that, although, on the admission of that State into the Union, a strenuous effort had been made to prohibit the existence of "involuntary servitude" within its limits; yet, that this effort had failed in its object, and resulted in what was called a "compromise." This appellation was allowed to an act which certainly bore nothing of the character of a compromise, though dignified with the name; for the patriot and democratic portion of both Houses united in the cause as one of common interests, without regard to sectional feelings and opinions, and succeeded to the utmost extent of their wishes.

Gordon gives it in these words:

"In all that territory ceded by France to the United States, under the name of Louisiana, which lies north of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, not included within the limits of the State of Missouri, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, FOREVER PROHIBITED."

Here is a distinct, formal and unequivocal recognition of the right, to hold slaves, in Missouri, and all that portion of what was formerly Louisiana, lying South of 36 1-2 degrees of North latitude. This, it will be recollected, forms the northern boundary line of the Territory of Arkansas. Our rights are here not only admitted but guaranteed and secured to us by the most sacred and solemn pledge or compact, which must and will remain inviolate, until we, voluntarily, withdraw from it and yield up our rights.

Now, in the name of common sense, how are our rights "admitted, guaranteed and secured to us," in the above quotation from Gordon! Slavery is positively prohibited north of a certain line—does that guarantee its admission south of that line! The United States ceded Lovely county to the Cherokees—was that cession a guarantee that the county of Crawford should not thereafter be ceded! "Slavery shall not exist in Delaware"—is that saving, slavery shall always exist in Maryland! Because the northern States gained all north of 36 deg. 30m. does it prove that they are never to take another slice? It is a "compact," to be sure, but it is a one-sided compact. It leaves us just as we were, until Congress see fit to extend the prohibition to us.

What sub-type of article is it?

Slavery Abolition Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Missouri Compromise Slavery Prohibition Arkansas Territory Involuntary Servitude Louisiana Territory Congressional Compact

What entities or persons were involved?

Arkansas (Writer) Gordon Missouri Arkansas Territory Congress Cherokees

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Critique Of Missouri Compromise's Guarantee Of Slavery In Arkansas

Stance / Tone

Anti Slavery Refutation Of Pro Slavery Claims

Key Figures

Arkansas (Writer) Gordon Missouri Arkansas Territory Congress Cherokees

Key Arguments

Missouri Compromise Prohibits Slavery North Of 36°30' N But Does Not Guarantee It South Of The Line The Compromise Is A One Sided Compact That Leaves Southern Territories Vulnerable To Future Prohibitions Effort To Ban Slavery In Missouri Failed, Resulting In A Misnamed 'Compromise' Analogy: Cession Of Lovely County To Cherokees Does Not Prevent Ceding Crawford County Analogy: Prohibition In Delaware Does Not Ensure Slavery In Maryland Northern States May Extend Prohibition Beyond The Line

Are you sure?