Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
November 6, 1844
The Northern Galaxy
Middlebury, Addison County, Vermont
What is this article about?
Editorial exposes James K. Polk's apparent hypocrisy on the protective tariff, citing Southern Democrat denunciation of it as benefiting Northern manufacturers and Northern supporters' endorsement of the 1842 tariff, while Polk remains silent on his position.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
POLK'S TWO FACES.
The Tennessee Democrat, published at Columbia, Mr. Polk's residence, a paper devoted to his support and undoubtedly speaking his sentiments, thus denounces the Whig Tariff and the policy of protection:
"The present Tariff was established for the purpose of enriching the NORTHERN MANUFACTURERS. at the expense of the mass of the people—to give capitalists a profit of from 30 to 40 per cent on their money invested in factories —whilst agriculture does not produce an income of 3 per cent—to make the rich richer, and the poor poorer.—And these acts are accomplishing.
When will the laboring people see the extent of the burthens which Whig policy is imposing upon them? When will those honest Whigs who support Henry Clay open their eyes and see that, by doing so, they are aiding in riveting upon the Country a System of Policy which deprives them of the benefit of one half their labor, and gives it to the rich of the North, that they may increase in wealth—enjoy their wine and fine dinners, and rejoice in the simplicity of the common people, in thus remaining their willing slaves."
This is for the South. Now look at the course of the Polk men in Pennsylvania. The Philadelphia U. S. Gazette of Monday says—
We saw and copied a handbill, posted on a house standing at the northeast corner Coates and Seventh street, and used as the Loco Foco head quarters on the day of the election, which read as follows—
"OREGON AND TEXAS—POLK,
DALLAS,
AND
SHUNK—DEMOCRATIC TARIFF OF 1842—and no Bank of the United States."
This is for the North! And while he is thus represented by his friends at the South as against the Tariff and by his friends at the North in favor of the Tariff, Mr. Polk himself STANDS MUTE and refuses to inform the people on which side of the question he really is! Electors! Will you vote for a candidate who conceals his opinions on this all important question of a Protective Tariff.
The Tennessee Democrat, published at Columbia, Mr. Polk's residence, a paper devoted to his support and undoubtedly speaking his sentiments, thus denounces the Whig Tariff and the policy of protection:
"The present Tariff was established for the purpose of enriching the NORTHERN MANUFACTURERS. at the expense of the mass of the people—to give capitalists a profit of from 30 to 40 per cent on their money invested in factories —whilst agriculture does not produce an income of 3 per cent—to make the rich richer, and the poor poorer.—And these acts are accomplishing.
When will the laboring people see the extent of the burthens which Whig policy is imposing upon them? When will those honest Whigs who support Henry Clay open their eyes and see that, by doing so, they are aiding in riveting upon the Country a System of Policy which deprives them of the benefit of one half their labor, and gives it to the rich of the North, that they may increase in wealth—enjoy their wine and fine dinners, and rejoice in the simplicity of the common people, in thus remaining their willing slaves."
This is for the South. Now look at the course of the Polk men in Pennsylvania. The Philadelphia U. S. Gazette of Monday says—
We saw and copied a handbill, posted on a house standing at the northeast corner Coates and Seventh street, and used as the Loco Foco head quarters on the day of the election, which read as follows—
"OREGON AND TEXAS—POLK,
DALLAS,
AND
SHUNK—DEMOCRATIC TARIFF OF 1842—and no Bank of the United States."
This is for the North! And while he is thus represented by his friends at the South as against the Tariff and by his friends at the North in favor of the Tariff, Mr. Polk himself STANDS MUTE and refuses to inform the people on which side of the question he really is! Electors! Will you vote for a candidate who conceals his opinions on this all important question of a Protective Tariff.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Economic Policy
Taxation
What keywords are associated?
Polk Tariff
Protective Tariff
Whig Policy
Democratic Tariff
Northern Manufacturers
Southern Agriculture
What entities or persons were involved?
James K. Polk
Henry Clay
Tennessee Democrat
Philadelphia U. S. Gazette
Whigs
Democrats
Loco Focos
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Polk's Inconsistent Stance On Protective Tariff
Stance / Tone
Anti Polk, Exposing Hypocrisy
Key Figures
James K. Polk
Henry Clay
Tennessee Democrat
Philadelphia U. S. Gazette
Whigs
Democrats
Loco Focos
Key Arguments
Southern Polk Supporters Denounce Whig Tariff As Enriching Northern Manufacturers At Expense Of Agriculture And Laborers
Northern Polk Supporters Endorse Democratic Tariff Of 1842
Polk Remains Silent On His True Position Regarding Protective Tariff
Voters Should Not Support A Candidate Who Conceals Opinions On Vital Issues