Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Virginia Gazette
Story September 22, 1768

The Virginia Gazette

Richmond, Williamsburg, Richmond County, Virginia

What is this article about?

In the Court of King's Bench, Mr. Wilkes was sentenced to fines and imprisonment for republishing North Briton No. 45 and publishing Essay on Woman, with additional security required. A writ of error was moved, and the sentence was received with fortitude. Commentary notes public sorrow and hopes for his future rise like Doctor Lucas.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

This morning, about a quarter before nine, Mr. Wilkes came into the court of King's Bench; and soon after, the court being sat, Mr. Justice Yates, after enlarging on the malignant nature and dangerous tendency of the two publications of which Mr. Wilkes had been convicted, proceeded to pronounce the judgment of the court: That for the re-publication of the North Briton No. 45, in volumes (of which two thousand copies had been printed for public sale) he should pay a fine of five hundred pounds, and be imprisoned ten calendar months; and for publishing the Essay on Woman (of which only twelve copies were printed, for the private use of so many particular friends) that he should pay likewise a fine of five hundred pounds, and be imprisoned twelve calendar months, to be computed from the expiration of the term of the former imprisonment; and that he afterwards find security for his good behaviour for seven years, himself to be bound in the sum of a thousand pounds, and two sureties in five hundred pounds each.

A writ of error returnable before the House of Lords was afterwards moved for, in order to reverse the judgment, on account of the alteration of the record; and the court recommended to the Attorney General to grant it on the first application.

This sentence, however heavy, was received with manly fortitude; after which, with composure of mind, he acquainted his Lordship that he should bring a writ of error into the House of Peers upon the alteration of the record; to which the Judge replied that if he thought himself injured he must follow such advice as counsel recommended to him for redress, but that the court of King's Bench had finally finished the cause, and no alteration could be admitted by that court.

We hear that Justice Yates displayed his talents so well in expatiating on the manifold evils which the Essay on Woman might have been productive of that the audience were of opinion he would grace the Spiritual Bench. And one of our poets has it.

That Kings can read,
And Kings we know can give.

It has been thought prudent, it seems, to put a padlock on the pen and tongue of a certain Gentleman during the usual period of one British Parliament.

Sorry are we to convey a piece of news to our readers that we are sensible will give the greatest part of them a heart-felt sorrow. They will deeply feel we know for a man who has been by many styled and thought the patriot of his country, who has already suffered a long exile and imprisonment, and must now undergo a heavy sentence; but the time may come that we may acquaint them of his having risen superior to all, like the celebrated Doctor Lucas of Ireland, who after being persecuted, exiled, and oppressed by every cruel act of unministerial tyranny, has, through the love and steadiness of the people, risen superior to all, proved himself to be one of the greatest patriots that ever Ireland produced, and has done his country the most essential services.

What sub-type of article is it?

Crime Story Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Crime Punishment Justice

What keywords are associated?

John Wilkes Kings Bench North Briton 45 Essay On Woman Sentencing Imprisonment Writ Of Error

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Wilkes Mr. Justice Yates Doctor Lucas

Where did it happen?

Court Of King's Bench

Story Details

Key Persons

Mr. Wilkes Mr. Justice Yates Doctor Lucas

Location

Court Of King's Bench

Event Date

This Morning

Story Details

Mr. Wilkes sentenced to fines of 500 pounds each and successive imprisonments of 10 and 12 months for republishing North Briton No. 45 and publishing Essay on Woman, plus security for good behavior; writ of error moved; received with fortitude; public sympathy expressed with hope for future vindication.

Are you sure?