Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 3, 1886
Lancaster Daily Intelligencer
Lancaster, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
What is this article about?
The editorial accuses the U.S. Senate of hypocrisy in rejecting President Cleveland's appointees, Collectors Chase and Pillsbury, for alleged roles in Maine election fraud, comparing it to Republican senators' complicity in the 1877 electoral contest where they gained positions through similar manipulations.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Hypocrites and Pretenders.
It is gratifying to see the United States
Senate display such a tender conscience as
it discloses in the rejection of Collectors
Chase and Pillsbury! These appointees
of President Cleveland are cast out be-
cause some of the senatorial pretenders
affect to believe they were ring-leaders
in one of the most infamous frauds ever
perpetrated, an attempt to count out a
lawfully elected governor of Maine.
Now the truth is those two
men
are intellectually, morally and politically
the peers of
fully
half
the
senators whose votes
were
thrown
for
the defeat of their confirmation in the
Senate. Granted that in the Maine elec-
tion case they stood upon the technicalities
rather than the equities of the situation,
this is not really so bad as Sherman, Ed-
mands, Hoar, Evarts, and the rest of them
did in the electoral contest of 1877. The
especial vileness and villainy of that trans-
action was that one principle of law was
applied in one case and a different one in
another; that the alleged equity controlled
in one instance while the extreme letter of
the law was appealed to in another; when
the returns suited, the face of them was
taken, and when they did not the conspira-
tors were quite willing to go behind them.
When fraud had been made triumphant
those who had engineered its success be-
came its prime beneficiaries. Stoughton.
Noyes and Kasson took share in the best
places abroad; and Evarts and Sherman be-
came the chief ministers in the new ad-
ministration at home; and every mean.
low, dirty scamp who had bribed and lied
the great conspiracy through was paid out
of the executive patronage and the federal
treasury. No Republican senator's voice
was raised against their confirmation, and
in all that long, eventful struggle only the
votes of Representatives Seelye and Pierce
were cast against their party's adherence
to wrong and its protection of crime.
The opposition to Pillsbury and Chase is
not a sign of conversion: it is un-
mitigated hypocrisy.
It is gratifying to see the United States
Senate display such a tender conscience as
it discloses in the rejection of Collectors
Chase and Pillsbury! These appointees
of President Cleveland are cast out be-
cause some of the senatorial pretenders
affect to believe they were ring-leaders
in one of the most infamous frauds ever
perpetrated, an attempt to count out a
lawfully elected governor of Maine.
Now the truth is those two
men
are intellectually, morally and politically
the peers of
fully
half
the
senators whose votes
were
thrown
for
the defeat of their confirmation in the
Senate. Granted that in the Maine elec-
tion case they stood upon the technicalities
rather than the equities of the situation,
this is not really so bad as Sherman, Ed-
mands, Hoar, Evarts, and the rest of them
did in the electoral contest of 1877. The
especial vileness and villainy of that trans-
action was that one principle of law was
applied in one case and a different one in
another; that the alleged equity controlled
in one instance while the extreme letter of
the law was appealed to in another; when
the returns suited, the face of them was
taken, and when they did not the conspira-
tors were quite willing to go behind them.
When fraud had been made triumphant
those who had engineered its success be-
came its prime beneficiaries. Stoughton.
Noyes and Kasson took share in the best
places abroad; and Evarts and Sherman be-
came the chief ministers in the new ad-
ministration at home; and every mean.
low, dirty scamp who had bribed and lied
the great conspiracy through was paid out
of the executive patronage and the federal
treasury. No Republican senator's voice
was raised against their confirmation, and
in all that long, eventful struggle only the
votes of Representatives Seelye and Pierce
were cast against their party's adherence
to wrong and its protection of crime.
The opposition to Pillsbury and Chase is
not a sign of conversion: it is un-
mitigated hypocrisy.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Senate Hypocrisy
Cleveland Appointees
Maine Election Fraud
1877 Electoral Commission
Republican Partisanship
What entities or persons were involved?
United States Senate
President Cleveland
Collectors Chase And Pillsbury
Sherman
Edmunds
Hoar
Evarts
Stoughton
Noyes
Kasson
Seelye
Pierce
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Senate Hypocrisy In Rejecting Cleveland's Appointees Over Maine Election Fraud
Stance / Tone
Strongly Accusatory Of Republican Hypocrisy
Key Figures
United States Senate
President Cleveland
Collectors Chase And Pillsbury
Sherman
Edmunds
Hoar
Evarts
Stoughton
Noyes
Kasson
Seelye
Pierce
Key Arguments
Senate Rejects Chase And Pillsbury For Alleged Maine Election Fraud Despite Their Peers Among Senators
Compares To 1877 Electoral Contest Where Republicans Applied Inconsistent Legal Principles For Gain
Beneficiaries Of 1877 Fraud Received High Positions Without Opposition
Current Opposition Is Pure Hypocrisy, Not Moral Conversion