Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 18, 1865
The Jeffersonian Democrat
Chardon, Geauga County, Ohio
What is this article about?
The editorial critiques the phrase 'logic of events' as an excuse used by unprepared politicians to postpone urgent moral questions, such as post-emancipation racial equality. It argues for immediate action to fulfill moral responsibilities, citing the Civil War's high costs as a lesson.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The "Logic of Events."
So much has been said, of late, about the "logic of events," that it is important to ascertain what is meant by the phrase. Without attempting to define it, we must enter our protest against the idea that it favors the indefinite postponement of all great moral questions that may arise. A more irrational or dangerous one never prevailed, even among modern politicians. We frequently hear men who aspire to be the leaders of public opinion, assert that the people are not prepared for this or that question which is agitating the country and demanding immediate settlement, and it should, therefore, be left to the "logic of events." These gentlemen are not such apt logicians as they seem to imagine: They ought to know that it is themselves, and not the people, who are unprepared. The "logic of events" will enlighten their understandings in the course of time; but it is hard, very hard, for those whose moral perceptions are more acute to await the slow process. The time to settle great questions is when they legitimately arise, and not to leave them to be settled in the indefinite future, by the "logic of events." To postpone them is to shirk our moral responsibility, and aggravate the difficulties and dangers that attend their settlement. As experience is a sure teacher, and even death a wise and beneficent provision in nature, so is the "logic of events" an infallible worker of human destiny, but always at the expense of those who place their highest trust in it. It was the "logic of events" that taught this reluctant Nation the policy of Emancipation, but at the cost of hundreds of thousands of precious lives and millions of treasure, if we need the lesson, it will yet teach us the policy of making all loyal men equal before the law. We have great faith in the "logic of events," but greater faith in truth and justice. Knowing our duty, what folly, what wrong, what cowardice, to stand waiting for the "logic of events" to compel us to do it!
So much has been said, of late, about the "logic of events," that it is important to ascertain what is meant by the phrase. Without attempting to define it, we must enter our protest against the idea that it favors the indefinite postponement of all great moral questions that may arise. A more irrational or dangerous one never prevailed, even among modern politicians. We frequently hear men who aspire to be the leaders of public opinion, assert that the people are not prepared for this or that question which is agitating the country and demanding immediate settlement, and it should, therefore, be left to the "logic of events." These gentlemen are not such apt logicians as they seem to imagine: They ought to know that it is themselves, and not the people, who are unprepared. The "logic of events" will enlighten their understandings in the course of time; but it is hard, very hard, for those whose moral perceptions are more acute to await the slow process. The time to settle great questions is when they legitimately arise, and not to leave them to be settled in the indefinite future, by the "logic of events." To postpone them is to shirk our moral responsibility, and aggravate the difficulties and dangers that attend their settlement. As experience is a sure teacher, and even death a wise and beneficent provision in nature, so is the "logic of events" an infallible worker of human destiny, but always at the expense of those who place their highest trust in it. It was the "logic of events" that taught this reluctant Nation the policy of Emancipation, but at the cost of hundreds of thousands of precious lives and millions of treasure, if we need the lesson, it will yet teach us the policy of making all loyal men equal before the law. We have great faith in the "logic of events," but greater faith in truth and justice. Knowing our duty, what folly, what wrong, what cowardice, to stand waiting for the "logic of events" to compel us to do it!
What sub-type of article is it?
Moral Or Religious
Social Reform
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Logic Of Events
Moral Responsibility
Emancipation Policy
Racial Equality
Political Postponement
Civil War Costs
What entities or persons were involved?
Politicians
Leaders Of Public Opinion
The Nation
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Postponing Moral And Political Reforms Via 'Logic Of Events'
Stance / Tone
Strongly Advocates Immediate Action On Justice And Equality
Key Figures
Politicians
Leaders Of Public Opinion
The Nation
Key Arguments
Postponing Great Moral Questions Shirks Responsibility And Aggravates Dangers
Politicians Claim People Are Unprepared, But They Themselves Are
'Logic Of Events' Enlightens Slowly And At Great Cost, As With Emancipation
Settle Issues When They Arise, Not Defer To Indefinite Future
Greater Faith In Truth And Justice Than In 'Logic Of Events'