Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 3, 1849
Green Mountain Freeman
Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont
What is this article about?
Editorial from Richmond Republican warns Southerners against allying with Northern Whigs and Democrats, highlighting betrayals by figures like Van Buren and Free Soilers in the election of Gen. Taylor, emphasizing protection of Southern institutions.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
The "Natural Allies."
From the Richmond (Va.) Republican--a Whig Paper.
The following, we presume, will satisfy the Whigs at the North of their alliance which they have formed, and what they have accomplished in the election of Gen. Taylor. The last paragraph speaks volumes. We commend it to the candid perusal of Northern antislavery whigs.
We presume that by this time the people of the South are getting their eyes open to the true character of their "natural allies." The fact is that while the mass of both parties at the North are opposed to the admission of Southern institutions into the new territories, the most persevering and inveterate leaders of the new Free Soil Party, are the old Marshals and Lieutenant Generals of Democracy, while the rank and file are taken in at least equal, (we think more likely greater) proportions from the same party. These men, from Van Buren down, are the most bitter, most radical, and most unrelenting of the adversaries of the South. They are carrying out with a vengeance the spirit of the wild democracy, of the free States, and aiming at the establishment of the superiority of physical force, as the greatest controlling principle of free government.
In Massachusetts and Connecticut, the Democrats have united with the Free Soilers to prevent an election of the Whig candidates. Here is another exhibition of that brotherly love of the "natural allies," about which we hear so much. Look at your brethren, men of the South. Likely men, are they not?
The truth is, the history of Martin Van Buren ought to stand as an eternal warning against "Natural Allies." No man was louder in his professions of friendship for Southern men and Southern institutions. His party here considered him a model of frankness and consistency, while they denounced the whig leader, Gen. Harrison, as an abolitionist. The mask has now fallen from Van Buren, as it has from thousands of his party. They are true to the South as long as the South is true to their interests, and no longer. Van Buren is but a fair representative of the selfish, bargaining, intriguing character of Northern Democracy. Thus we see even the Northern men who sustained Cass, now coalescing with the Free Soilers of Connecticut, to defeat the election of Whigs to the councils of the nation.
And why? Are we told the South is to be punished for refusing to support Gen. Cass? A noble principle indeed upon which to act! And a noble people the South would be if their indignation is not aroused by the idea that they are only to obtain Northern friends by voting for Northern men, and to be punished for neglect to do so by assaults upon their institutions.
Let the South ask which are its men who from interest or revenge thus desert and betray its cause or the Whigs give us solid deeds instead of pretty words and winsome natural allies.
Southern man to the Presidency who cannot stab the South unless the dagger first passes through his own breast, and who will not permit Southern rights and institutions to be invaded while his hand guards the Constitution.
From the Richmond (Va.) Republican--a Whig Paper.
The following, we presume, will satisfy the Whigs at the North of their alliance which they have formed, and what they have accomplished in the election of Gen. Taylor. The last paragraph speaks volumes. We commend it to the candid perusal of Northern antislavery whigs.
We presume that by this time the people of the South are getting their eyes open to the true character of their "natural allies." The fact is that while the mass of both parties at the North are opposed to the admission of Southern institutions into the new territories, the most persevering and inveterate leaders of the new Free Soil Party, are the old Marshals and Lieutenant Generals of Democracy, while the rank and file are taken in at least equal, (we think more likely greater) proportions from the same party. These men, from Van Buren down, are the most bitter, most radical, and most unrelenting of the adversaries of the South. They are carrying out with a vengeance the spirit of the wild democracy, of the free States, and aiming at the establishment of the superiority of physical force, as the greatest controlling principle of free government.
In Massachusetts and Connecticut, the Democrats have united with the Free Soilers to prevent an election of the Whig candidates. Here is another exhibition of that brotherly love of the "natural allies," about which we hear so much. Look at your brethren, men of the South. Likely men, are they not?
The truth is, the history of Martin Van Buren ought to stand as an eternal warning against "Natural Allies." No man was louder in his professions of friendship for Southern men and Southern institutions. His party here considered him a model of frankness and consistency, while they denounced the whig leader, Gen. Harrison, as an abolitionist. The mask has now fallen from Van Buren, as it has from thousands of his party. They are true to the South as long as the South is true to their interests, and no longer. Van Buren is but a fair representative of the selfish, bargaining, intriguing character of Northern Democracy. Thus we see even the Northern men who sustained Cass, now coalescing with the Free Soilers of Connecticut, to defeat the election of Whigs to the councils of the nation.
And why? Are we told the South is to be punished for refusing to support Gen. Cass? A noble principle indeed upon which to act! And a noble people the South would be if their indignation is not aroused by the idea that they are only to obtain Northern friends by voting for Northern men, and to be punished for neglect to do so by assaults upon their institutions.
Let the South ask which are its men who from interest or revenge thus desert and betray its cause or the Whigs give us solid deeds instead of pretty words and winsome natural allies.
Southern man to the Presidency who cannot stab the South unless the dagger first passes through his own breast, and who will not permit Southern rights and institutions to be invaded while his hand guards the Constitution.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Slavery Abolition
What keywords are associated?
Natural Allies
Free Soil Party
Southern Institutions
Martin Van Buren
Northern Democrats
Whig Alliance
Territories Slavery
What entities or persons were involved?
Gen. Taylor
Martin Van Buren
Gen. Cass
Gen. Harrison
Free Soil Party
Northern Democrats
Whigs
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Warning Against Northern Natural Allies For The South
Stance / Tone
Strongly Pro Southern Rights, Critical Of Northern Democrats And Free Soilers
Key Figures
Gen. Taylor
Martin Van Buren
Gen. Cass
Gen. Harrison
Free Soil Party
Northern Democrats
Whigs
Key Arguments
Northern Parties Oppose Southern Institutions In New Territories
Free Soil Leaders Are Former Democrats Like Van Buren, Bitter Adversaries Of The South
Democrats Unite With Free Soilers To Block Whig Elections In Massachusetts And Connecticut
Van Buren's History Shows False Friendship To Southern Interests
Northern Democrats Betray South When Interests Diverge
South Should Demand Whigs Protect Southern Rights With Actions, Not Words