Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
July 5, 1822
American Watchman And Delaware Advertiser
Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware
What is this article about?
The editorial, citing the Aurora, defends Mr. Jefferson against calumnies by 'Native Virginian,' portraying the accuser as malicious and dishonest, ultimately discredited by his own arguments.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
A PLAIN CASE.
We have never, says the Aurora, seen a writer more completely punished by his own malign perversity, than the writer under the signature of 'Native Virginian.' No man open to fair and dispassionate reasoning, could have refused to accept the explanation of Mr. Jefferson's first letter; but it seems, that though bred a lawyer, his heart was too open and free from suspicion, to guard against the cavils of a pettifogger; and political justice has no cause to regret his exemption from this vicious disposition; his candor afforded the temptation, by which the accuser was more deeply committed and convicted: at first, the reproach of the calumny might have rested upon the obscurity or the negligence of accountants; but in the ultimate course, the writer had neither the good sense nor the prudence to resist the malignity of his passions—and now he stands doubly detected. No confidence can be reposed in a writer capable of such dishonest and uncandid conduct. Nothing that he can say—or that can be said for him, can have any other effect, than to sink him & his abettors in deeper contempt and common discredit.
We have never, says the Aurora, seen a writer more completely punished by his own malign perversity, than the writer under the signature of 'Native Virginian.' No man open to fair and dispassionate reasoning, could have refused to accept the explanation of Mr. Jefferson's first letter; but it seems, that though bred a lawyer, his heart was too open and free from suspicion, to guard against the cavils of a pettifogger; and political justice has no cause to regret his exemption from this vicious disposition; his candor afforded the temptation, by which the accuser was more deeply committed and convicted: at first, the reproach of the calumny might have rested upon the obscurity or the negligence of accountants; but in the ultimate course, the writer had neither the good sense nor the prudence to resist the malignity of his passions—and now he stands doubly detected. No confidence can be reposed in a writer capable of such dishonest and uncandid conduct. Nothing that he can say—or that can be said for him, can have any other effect, than to sink him & his abettors in deeper contempt and common discredit.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Jefferson Defense
Political Calumny
Native Virginian
Malign Perversity
Aurora
Dishonest Writer
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Jefferson
Native Virginian
Aurora
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Jefferson Against Native Virginian's Calumny
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Jefferson, Condemnatory Of Accuser's Dishonesty
Key Figures
Mr. Jefferson
Native Virginian
Aurora
Key Arguments
No Reasonable Person Would Reject Jefferson's Letter Explanation
Accuser's Malignity Led To His Own Conviction
Jefferson's Candor Exposed The Accuser's Pettifogging
Writer Lacks Good Sense And Prudence
No Confidence In Such Dishonest Conduct
Accuser And Abettors Deserve Contempt