Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 7, 1806
Alexandria Daily Advertiser
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
A communication in the Baltimore Federal Gazette defends William Pitt's legacy against criticism in Philadelphia's Aurora, highlighting his achievements in preserving Britain from revolution and invasion, and notes positive US-Britain relations post his death.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
From the Baltimore Federal Gazette
Communication.
While the English nation are demonstrating to all the world, the high sense they entertain of the talents and services of the deceased Mr. Pitt, the editor of the Aurora, a paper published in Philadelphia continues his endeavours day after day, with the most unaccountable solicitude to blacken the memory of this statesman.
These diatribes exhibit a deprivation of principle the most scandalous, unveiled with an effrontery which sets at defiance all national dignity and decorum. Belonging neither to the partisans of the deceased Mr. Pitt, nor the living Mr. Fox, strangers alike to both, we cannot but consider such tirades from the American press, as unmanly and injurious to the American character. Will historians charge it as a crime to this statesman, to have preserved his country from a revolution? To have extended its possessions in the East and West Indies? and to have prevented, if but for a season, the calamities of invasion by producing a continental confederacy calculated to lessen the tremendous power of its inveterate enemy? Will impartial history after detailing the gigantic means employed by one of the most formidable conquerors the earth ever beheld to subjugate a little island, allow no merit to the man who saved it?
According to the account given by this licentious editor, in the Aurora of the 29th ultimo, the murders committed by the order of Robespierre, appear as nothing when compared with the sanguinary acts of Mr. Pitt. Europe he tells us rid of this monster, will enjoy a respite from the intrigues of the British cabinet; and with respect to the United States, "his death is of so much importance as almost to deserve a celebration from one end of the union to the other."
We offer as a contrast to this bilious insinuation of the evils intended by Mr. Pitt to the United States, the following extract of a letter, written by a member of congress: Under date of the 20th of March taken from the Commercial Register published in Philadelphia:
"It is no longer doubted that the difference between the United States and G. Britain will be happily accommodated, especially as previous to the death of Mr. Pitt, instructions had been issued by the British government, to ascertain the number of American captures, and to estimate the damage sustained by our merchants."
Considering this information to be founded on advices received from our minister—we sincerely hope that the members composing the present administration of G. Britain, will faithfully fulfill towards the United States the intentions of their predecessors.
Communication.
While the English nation are demonstrating to all the world, the high sense they entertain of the talents and services of the deceased Mr. Pitt, the editor of the Aurora, a paper published in Philadelphia continues his endeavours day after day, with the most unaccountable solicitude to blacken the memory of this statesman.
These diatribes exhibit a deprivation of principle the most scandalous, unveiled with an effrontery which sets at defiance all national dignity and decorum. Belonging neither to the partisans of the deceased Mr. Pitt, nor the living Mr. Fox, strangers alike to both, we cannot but consider such tirades from the American press, as unmanly and injurious to the American character. Will historians charge it as a crime to this statesman, to have preserved his country from a revolution? To have extended its possessions in the East and West Indies? and to have prevented, if but for a season, the calamities of invasion by producing a continental confederacy calculated to lessen the tremendous power of its inveterate enemy? Will impartial history after detailing the gigantic means employed by one of the most formidable conquerors the earth ever beheld to subjugate a little island, allow no merit to the man who saved it?
According to the account given by this licentious editor, in the Aurora of the 29th ultimo, the murders committed by the order of Robespierre, appear as nothing when compared with the sanguinary acts of Mr. Pitt. Europe he tells us rid of this monster, will enjoy a respite from the intrigues of the British cabinet; and with respect to the United States, "his death is of so much importance as almost to deserve a celebration from one end of the union to the other."
We offer as a contrast to this bilious insinuation of the evils intended by Mr. Pitt to the United States, the following extract of a letter, written by a member of congress: Under date of the 20th of March taken from the Commercial Register published in Philadelphia:
"It is no longer doubted that the difference between the United States and G. Britain will be happily accommodated, especially as previous to the death of Mr. Pitt, instructions had been issued by the British government, to ascertain the number of American captures, and to estimate the damage sustained by our merchants."
Considering this information to be founded on advices received from our minister—we sincerely hope that the members composing the present administration of G. Britain, will faithfully fulfill towards the United States the intentions of their predecessors.
What sub-type of article is it?
Foreign Affairs
Press Freedom
What keywords are associated?
William Pitt
Aurora Criticism
British Statesman
Us Britain Relations
Press Decorum
Pitt Legacy
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Pitt
Editor Of The Aurora
Mr. Fox
Robespierre
British Government
United States
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of William Pitt Against Aurora Criticism
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Pitt, Critical Of Aurora Editor
Key Figures
Mr. Pitt
Editor Of The Aurora
Mr. Fox
Robespierre
British Government
United States
Key Arguments
Pitt Preserved Britain From Revolution
Pitt Extended British Possessions In East And West Indies
Pitt Prevented Invasion Through Continental Confederacy
Aurora's Criticism Is Unmanly And Injurious To American Character
Pitt's Death May Lead To Improved Us Britain Relations
British Instructions To Compensate American Merchants