Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Anti Slavery Bugle
Editorial March 10, 1848

Anti Slavery Bugle

New Lisbon, Salem, Columbiana County, Ohio

What is this article about?

The editorial argues that slavery in states is not unconstitutional, warning against interpretations that could centralize federal power. It advocates focusing anti-slavery efforts on federal territories, national jurisdictions, and urging states to abolish slavery voluntarily, promoting unity among abolitionists.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Slavery in the States.

Many insist that slavery in the States is repugnant to the Constitution of the Union. We think no such position can be maintained, except by construction so constrained, that the common sense of unbiased men, will, we fear, never acquiesce in it;—by construction so dangerous, also, that, if it were once received, it would, in our view, annihilate the rights of the States, and convert our federal system into a consolidated government.

Nothing, we apprehend, is gained to the cause of freedom, by insisting on a position so doubtful—not to say, so untenable. We have ground enough to stand upon, in the conflict with slavery, without resorting to that.

Denying to the Federal Government all power to create or sanction slavery in territories, or the seas; insisting that it shall remove every trace of slavery from every place under the exclusive jurisdiction of the nation; and urging upon State Governments, and the people of the States, to take measures for the certain and final extinction of slavery within State limits—we need resort, as it seems to us, only to maxims of interpretation, principles of construction, and topics of argument, which will commend themselves to the approval of the candid, and carry conviction to the understandings of the intelligent.

There is room enough here for all to work with direct practical effect. Upon this ground, we would have all lovers of freedom banded in council, and laboring together.

If, however, some choose to toil elsewhere, and upon positions which seem to us less promising, we have no coldness or censures, but only good wishes and warm regards for them. All we ask for, is, like forbearance and sympathy.—Louisville Exam.

What sub-type of article is it?

Slavery Abolition Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Slavery Constitution States Rights Federal Power Abolition Territories

What entities or persons were involved?

Federal Government State Governments Louisville Exam.

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Constitutionality Of State Slavery And Federal Limits

Stance / Tone

Cautious Anti Slavery Advocating State Led Abolition And Federal Restraint

Key Figures

Federal Government State Governments Louisville Exam.

Key Arguments

Slavery In States Not Repugnant To Constitution Without Strained Interpretation Such Interpretation Risks Consolidating Federal Power Over States Focus Anti Slavery On Denying Federal Power In Territories And National Jurisdictions Urge States To Extinguish Slavery Voluntarily Promote Unity Among Freedom Advocates On Solid Grounds

Are you sure?