Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe New Hampshire Gazette
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
On July 4, 1794, the Democratic Society in Wythe County, Virginia, adopts and publishes an address to the US people, supporting the French Revolution, condemning British despotism, criticizing the US government's pro-British stance and mistreatment of France, and denouncing President Washington's appointment of Chief Justice Jay as a violation of separation of powers, calling for political change.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Wythe Court-House Virginia,
July 4, 1794.
The Democratic Society met according to adjournment, Citizen William Neely, chosen chairman of the sitting, Citizen John Montgomery, chosen Secretary.
On motion of Citizen Alexander Smyth.
Ordered, That a Committee be appointed to prepare an address to the people of the United States: and a Committee was accordingly appointed, of Citizens Alexander Smyth, Daniel Sheffy, Jehu Stephens, Jesse Evans, Joseph Crocket, William Drope, and William Hay.
Citizen Alexander Smyth, from the Committee appointed, reported an Address, which being read, was unanimously agreed to.
Ordered, That the said Address be signed by the Chairman and published.
ADDRESS,
Of the DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY in
Wythe County, Virginia, to the People of
the United States.
FELLOW CITIZENS,
It is a right of the people peaceably to
assemble and deliberate—it is a right of
the people to publish their sentiments.
These rights we exercise, and esteem in-
valuable.
A war raging in Europe; a war of ty-
rants against liberty, cannot be unfelt by
the people of the United States; it has
roused our feelings. We have rejoiced
when victory followed the standards of li-
berty. When despots were successful,
we have experienced the deepest anxiety.
We have lamented that our good wishes
were the only aid we could give the
French.
Among the different powers combined
against the rights of man, we have mar-
ked the British nation, the champion of
despotism. With indignation we have
heard their insolent dictates to the small
neutral powers of Europe, to join in the
subjugation of France. With sorrow we
have seen every principle of liberty,
hitherto retained by the people of Britain,
violated by its present corrupt govern-
ment, and their most virtuous inhabi-
tants transported to foreign lands, or going
into voluntary exile: But we hope these
things will ultimately produce good, and
that there is still a latent spark, which by
excessive friction, will kindle to a flame.
and will consume the rotten edifice of the
British government, on the ruins of which
another may arise, the basis whereof shall
be justice; liberty and equality.
While with anxious expectation we con-
template the affairs of Europe, it will be
criminal to forget our own country. A
session of Congress having just passed, the
first in which the people were equally re-
presented, it is a fit time to take a retro-
spective view of the proceedings of govern-
ment.—We have watched each motion of
those in power, but are sorry we cannot
exclaim "well done thou good and faith-
ful servant." We have seen the nation
insulted, our rights violated, our com-
merce ruined—and what has been the
conduct of government? Under the cor-
rupt influence of the paper system, it has
uniformly crouched to Britain; while on
the contrary our allies, the French, to
whom we owe our political existence, have
been treated unfriendly; denied any ad-
vantages from their treaties with us; their
Minister abused; and those individuals
among us, who desired to aid their arms,
prosecuted as traitors—blush Americans
for the conduct of your government.
Citizens,
Shall we Americans, who have kindled
the spark of liberty, stand aloof and see
it extinguished, when burning a bright
flame in France, which hath caught it
from us? Do you not see if despots pre-
vail, you must have a despot like the rest
of the nations? If all tyrants unite against
free people, should not all free people u-
nite against tyrants? Yes! Let us unite
with France, and stand or fall together.
We lament that a man who hath so
long possessed the public confidence, as
the head of the executive department hath
possessed it, should put it to so severe a trial.
as he hath by a late appointment. The
constitution hath been trampled on, and
your rights have no security.
Citizens! What is despotism? Is it
not a union of executive, legislative and
judicial authorities in the same hands?
This union, then, has been effected. Your
chief justice has been appointed to an ex-
ecutive office, by the head of that branch
of government: In that capacity he is to
make Treaties: Those treaties are your
Supreme law; and of this supreme law he is
supreme judge!! What has become of your
constitution and liberties?
Fellow Citizens,
We hope the misconduct of the execu-
tive may have proceeded from bad advice;
but we can only look to the immediate
cause of the mischief. To us it seems a
radical change of measures is necessary.
How shall this be effected? Citizens! It
is to be effected by a change of men.
Deny the continuance of your confidence
to such members of the legislative body
as have an interest distinct from that of
the people. To trust yourselves to stock-
holders, what is it, but like the Romans,
to deliver the poor debtor to his creditor,
as his absolute property. To trust your-
selves to speculators, what is it, but to
commit the lamb to the wolf to be de-
voured.
It was recommended by the conven-
tions of some of the states, so to amend
the constitution, as to incapacitate any
man to serve as president more than eight
years successively. Consider well this ex-
periment. 'Tis probably the most certain
way to purge the different departments,
and produce a new state of things.
Believe us, fellow-citizens, the public
welfare is our only motive.
WILLIAM NEELY, Chairman.
Attest,
JOHN MONTGOMERY, Sec'y.
The Republican Printers throughout
the Union, are requested to publish this ad-
dress.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Support For French Revolution And Criticism Of Us Pro British Government Policies
Stance / Tone
Pro French Alliance, Anti British, Critical Of Executive Overreach
Key Figures
Key Arguments