Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe National Republican And Cincinnati Daily Mercantile Advertiser
Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio
What is this article about?
Controversy arises over the election of Gales & Seaton as Printers to the House of Representatives by one vote over F.P. Blair, with Blair alleging a miscount that actually gave him 100 votes to their 99.
OCR Quality
Full Text
It will be remembered that Gales & Seaton, of the National Intelligencer, were elected Printers to the House of Representatives, towards the close of the session, by a majority of one vote over F. P. Blair. Editor of the Globe. In the Globe of the 20th inst., is an editorial from the pen of Mr. Blair, presenting a detailed statement of the ballotting on that occasion, and adducing proofs to show that, either through accident or design, an error occurred in the counting of the ballots, and that, instead of Gales & Seaton being elected, on the last ballot, they had, in reality, but ninety-nine votes, while Blair had one hundred! The article in the Globe is too long for us to copy-we can, therefore, advert to but a very few of the facts upon which Mr. Blair relies to substantiate his allegations.
The Globe gives the following as the true vote given to Mr. Blair, by the administration members of the House of Representatives— counting by States:
Of Maine, 6; New Hampshire, 5; New York, 19; Pennsylvania, 14; Maryland, 4; Virginia, 9; North Carolina, 7; South Carolina, 2; Georgia, 4; Kentucky, 5; Tennessee, 8; Ohio, 5; Alabama, 2; Indiana, 2; Illinois, 1; Missouri, 1; Mississippi, 1. Making in all, 95. To these the Globe adds five votes, given Mr. Blair by members, heretofore counted in the opposition, and of which Mr. Blair had conclusive evidence in the subsequent assurances of those members, that they had so voted. Thus the true vote given to Mr. Blair was one hundred; while that given to Gales and Seaton, was but ninety-nine.
There were two hundred and three members in the House, during the last ballotting: and the Globe, to all appearance, clearly establishes the fact, from its own shewing, that there must have been either a miscount through accident or with a design to defraud. It is to be hoped that an examination of the matter will be speedily instituted.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Event Date
Towards The Close Of The Session
Key Persons
Outcome
alleged miscount: blair claims 100 votes, gales & seaton 99; call for examination.
Event Details
Gales & Seaton elected Printers to the House by one vote over F. P. Blair. Blair's editorial in the Globe of the 20th inst. provides evidence of ballot counting error, claiming true votes were 100 for Blair and 99 for Gales & Seaton, possibly accidental or designed fraud. Details votes by states totaling 95 from administration members plus 5 more.