Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Potters Herald
Story August 14, 1947

The Potters Herald

East Liverpool, Columbiana County, Ohio

What is this article about?

In Hartford, Conn., last week, the Connecticut state AFL and a local union ran newspaper ads urging defeat of Sen. Robert Taft and six GOP representatives who supported the Taft-Hartley law, deliberately violating its ban on union political spending to force a test case.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

AFL Challenges
Taft Law Again

Hartford, Conn. (LPA) - The Connecticut state AFL gave the Justice Dep't and Sen. Robert Taft (R., Ohio) another chance to make a test case of the Taft-Hartley law here last week when it joined with a local AFL union in placing paid newspaper ads calling for the defeat of Sen. Rob't Taft (R. Ohio and connecticut members of Congress who voted for the T-H law.

Carried in the Hartford Times, the ads were a deliberate challenge of the Taft-Hartley prohibition on unions making expenditures in political campaigns. The ads called for the defeat of Taft if he should be a presidential nominee and the rejection of six GOP Connecticut Representatives who voted for the anti-labor law.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice

What keywords are associated?

Afl Challenge Taft Hartley Law Political Ads Senator Taft Union Expenditures Connecticut Congressmen

What entities or persons were involved?

Connecticut State Afl Sen. Robert Taft Local Afl Union Six Gop Connecticut Representatives

Where did it happen?

Hartford, Conn.

Story Details

Key Persons

Connecticut State Afl Sen. Robert Taft Local Afl Union Six Gop Connecticut Representatives

Location

Hartford, Conn.

Event Date

Last Week

Story Details

The Connecticut state AFL joined with a local AFL union to place paid newspaper ads calling for the defeat of Sen. Robert Taft and Connecticut members of Congress who voted for the Taft-Hartley law, deliberately challenging the law's prohibition on union political expenditures to provoke a test case.

Are you sure?