Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeGazette Of The United States
New York, New York County, New York
What is this article about?
Richard R. Smith, late Sheriff of Otsego County, New York, defends his conduct against accusations of fraud in a public address, condemning the affiant as a drunken fool and the committee for acting without a hearing, asserting his integrity and firmness against party calumnies. Dated July 4, 1792, from Coopertown.
OCR Quality
Full Text
I cannot help giving it as my opinion that it was but a shallow pretence for so horrid a violation of public right, and that the evidence produced was by far too slender, on which to have determined a matter of much less importance. I despise the person who made the affidavit, they mention, with a view to insinuate a fraud on my part—and I despise the man, who, under pretence of believing it, condemned my conduct without a hearing, or even informing me that I was suspected.—I know that I have a conscience, and that I sustain a character which will support me under all the calumnies of party—and, I possess a firmness and fidelity to my trust, which all the bribes and all the offices in the power of a monarch to bestow shall never make me relinquish for a moment—I feel the insult offered me by the committee—I despise the drunken fool who made the affidavit. and however dignified his station in the county may be, I am not afraid to contrast my reputation with his. I am seldom seen staggering about—neither am I in possession of those talents for cringing and servile flattery, by which he is so eminently distinguished—which mark him as the qualified tool of party, and fit him for any dirty work his masters may choose to set him at.
RICHARD R. SMITH.
late Sheriff of Otsego.
Coopertown, July 4, 1792.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Letter to Editor Details
Author
Richard R. Smith
Recipient
The Public
Main Argument
the accusations against smith's conduct as sheriff are based on slender evidence and a false affidavit by a despised, drunken fool; he condemns the committee for violating public right without giving him a hearing and affirms his unyielding integrity against party calumnies and bribes.
Notable Details