Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Grant County Herald
Story December 26, 1853

Grant County Herald

Lancaster, Grant County, Wisconsin

What is this article about?

In a U.S. Circuit Court ruling in Boston, Judge Sprague held that exhibiting or publicly using a 'confidential' letter to injure the writer or third party constitutes a gross violation of privilege, making the offender liable for damages. This aligns with Webster's definition of 'confidential.'

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Use of 'Confidential' Letters.

In a ruling upon this subject, in the U. S. Circuit Court in Boston, Judge Sprague decided that a person exhibiting to another a letter marked "confidential," or otherwise using its contents thus publicly, to the injury of the writer or a third party, was guilty of a gross violation of privilege, and might be held pecuniarily liable for damages resulting from such breach of confidence. The legal construction of the term "confidential," is in perfect accordance with the definition of the word as given by Webster.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Curiosity

What themes does it cover?

Justice Deception

What keywords are associated?

Confidential Letters Court Ruling Breach Of Confidence Legal Liability

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Sprague

Where did it happen?

U. S. Circuit Court In Boston

Story Details

Key Persons

Judge Sprague

Location

U. S. Circuit Court In Boston

Story Details

Judge Sprague rules that publicly exhibiting or using contents of a confidential letter, causing injury to the writer or third party, is a violation of privilege with pecuniary liability for damages.

Are you sure?