Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeGrant County Herald
Lancaster, Grant County, Wisconsin
What is this article about?
In a U.S. Circuit Court ruling in Boston, Judge Sprague held that exhibiting or publicly using a 'confidential' letter to injure the writer or third party constitutes a gross violation of privilege, making the offender liable for damages. This aligns with Webster's definition of 'confidential.'
OCR Quality
Full Text
In a ruling upon this subject, in the U. S. Circuit Court in Boston, Judge Sprague decided that a person exhibiting to another a letter marked "confidential," or otherwise using its contents thus publicly, to the injury of the writer or a third party, was guilty of a gross violation of privilege, and might be held pecuniarily liable for damages resulting from such breach of confidence. The legal construction of the term "confidential," is in perfect accordance with the definition of the word as given by Webster.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
U. S. Circuit Court In Boston
Story Details
Judge Sprague rules that publicly exhibiting or using contents of a confidential letter, causing injury to the writer or third party, is a violation of privilege with pecuniary liability for damages.