Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Thomas's Massachusetts Spy, Or, Worcester Gazette
Foreign News April 4, 1821

Thomas's Massachusetts Spy, Or, Worcester Gazette

Worcester, Worcester County, Massachusetts

What is this article about?

In London on Feb. 3, Mr. Brougham moved for a rule to file a criminal information against Rev. Richard Blacow for libeling the Queen in a Nov. 26 sermon at St. Mark's church, Liverpool. The court granted the rule after hearing part of the libel.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

FOREIGN.

LONDON, FEB. 3.

The Queen.—Mr. Brougham moved for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against the Rev. Richard Blacow, M.A. a minister of the established Church, residing at Liverpool, for a libel on the Queen, supposed to be contained in a certain discourse preached by him on the 26th of November, at St. Mark's church.

As the application was ex parte, we cannot enter into the particulars; but the court thought it fit to grant the rule, on hearing part of the alleged libel.

Mr. Brougham observed, that the libel was not of and concerning a part of her Majesty's conduct which had been in issue; but was published in reference to her going to church, and receiving the sacrament.

What sub-type of article is it?

Court News

What keywords are associated?

Queen Libel Brougham Motion Blacow Sermon Liverpool Minister St Marks Church

What entities or persons were involved?

Queen Mr. Brougham Rev. Richard Blacow

Where did it happen?

London

Foreign News Details

Primary Location

London

Event Date

February 3

Key Persons

Queen Mr. Brougham Rev. Richard Blacow

Outcome

the court granted the rule to show cause after hearing part of the alleged libel.

Event Details

Mr. Brougham moved for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against Rev. Richard Blacow, a minister in Liverpool, for a libel on the Queen in a discourse preached on November 26 at St. Mark's church. The libel concerned her going to church and receiving the sacrament, not prior conduct issues. The ex parte application details were not entered, but the court granted the rule.

Are you sure?