Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Phenix Gazette
Foreign News October 15, 1825

Phenix Gazette

Alexandria, Virginia

What is this article about?

Critique of the British Court of Chancery's abuses, including excessive costs, delays, and patronage. A widow's 1825 petition to the House of Commons details her 22-month imprisonment and pauperization after her husband's estate was depleted by £1,153 in court fees from a £1,496 property.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The British Court of Chancery is one of the most awfully wicked establishments that ever was devised amongst men. A gentleman, who lately died, set aside 50,000l. to defray the expenses of an anticipated suit, and another declared that he would rather "hear the last trumpet" than a citation to appear before it! The Lord Chancellor complains that his salary does not exceed £60,000 a year, besides what he receives as Speaker of the House of Lords, &c. and he had 140 offices in his gift, much patronage in the Church, and the nomination of the puisne judges, &c. The delays of decision; the frauds committed in the shape of fees, &c. has roused the public indignation, and reformation is to be hoped for.—The following statement of a solitary case may serve to shew the amount of the iniquity nursed in this abomination of pretended equity:

On the 27th June, a petition was presented, in the British House of Commons, from a widow, now a pauper, dependent on the parish of Greenwich. The petition stated that, in 1773, she had married a carpenter, who had amassed a small property and purchased some lands. Her husband died, and his affairs were thrown into Chancery in 1810. Eleven years afterwards, although the freehold estate was worth £960 pounds, the Court had collected £400 pounds. In August, 1824, £242 pounds, in addition, had been collected. The total amount of the poor man's property was £1,496 pounds; and the costs of the chancery suit had run up to £1,153 pounds. The widow was ordered to give up the title deeds to the Court. She could not do this, because the property consisted of mortgaged lands which had been purchased; and the titles were lodged as securities with the mortgagees. For her non compliance with the order of the Court, she was attached, and cast into the Fleet prison, where she had remained 22 months. The cost of the attachment was £95 pounds, which she was utterly unable to pay, and she was released by the petty savings of her poor relatives. She is now 78 years of age; the balance of her husband's property had procured her an annuity of £70 pounds a year, but it had been absorbed by the Court of Chancery, and the widow was now a pauper, subsisting on the charity of the parish. The petition was referred to the commissioners who have been appointed to investigate the abuses of the Court of Chancery. A Chancery attachment, it appears, is the last attachment a female should be desirous to provoke.

What sub-type of article is it?

Political

What keywords are associated?

Court Of Chancery Legal Abuses Widow Petition House Of Commons Chancery Costs Fleet Prison

What entities or persons were involved?

Lord Chancellor

Where did it happen?

Britain

Foreign News Details

Primary Location

Britain

Event Date

27th June

Key Persons

Lord Chancellor

Outcome

widow imprisoned 22 months in fleet prison, estate of £1,496 depleted by £1,153 in costs plus £95 attachment fees, reduced to pauper on parish charity at age 78; petition referred to commissioners for investigation.

Event Details

Criticism of British Court of Chancery for delays, frauds, high fees, and Lord Chancellor's £60,000 salary plus patronage. Specific case: Widow's petition to House of Commons on 27th June details husband's 1810 Chancery case after 1773 marriage; estate collections totaled £1,496 by August 1824, but costs reached £1,153; imprisoned for not surrendering mortgaged title deeds, released after 22 months via relatives' savings; annuity absorbed, now pauper in Greenwich parish.

Are you sure?