Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Morning Astorian
Domestic News April 18, 1909

The Morning Astorian

Astoria, Clatsop County, Oregon

What is this article about?

In Chicago, City Sealer Kjellander is surveying bread loaf weights amid allegations of short weights by bakers. He cannot prosecute due to an ongoing appeal of a court ruling deeming the bread weight ordinance unconstitutional, but plans to use data for future enforcement if upheld or to push for a new law.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

BREAD LOAVES SMALLER.

In Chicago Short Weights Said To Be Given.

CHICAGO, April 17.—City Sealer Kjellander has begun a canvass to ascertain the weight of loaves of bread sold by dealers throughout the city. Owing to litigation over the city ordinance requiring bakers to give full weight loaves to customers, Mr. Kjellander is powerless to begin prosecutions but he announces that the data he obtained would be used in a further effort to prevent bakers from selling short weight bread. Several months ago Judge Windes held that the bread ordinance was unconstitutional and an appeal was taken by the city to the Supreme Court. A decision is expected from that tribunal within the next few weeks, and if Judge's opinion is sustained Mr. Kjellander proposes to urge the passage of a new ordinance.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court Economic

What keywords are associated?

Bread Weights Chicago Bakers Ordinance Litigation Short Weights Supreme Court Appeal

What entities or persons were involved?

City Sealer Kjellander Judge Windes

Where did it happen?

Chicago

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Chicago

Event Date

April 17

Key Persons

City Sealer Kjellander Judge Windes

Outcome

pending supreme court decision on bread ordinance appeal; potential new ordinance if ruling sustained

Event Details

City Sealer Kjellander conducting survey of bread loaf weights due to short weight complaints; cannot prosecute pending appeal of unconstitutional ruling by Judge Windes

Are you sure?