Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
October 20, 1821
Winchester Gazette
Winchester, Virginia
What is this article about?
Winchester Gazette editorial from October 20, 1821, criticizes Gen. Jackson's conduct in the case of Col. Callava and Judge Fromentin, arguing he exceeded his powers, references Richmond Enquirer and Charleston Southern Patriot articles, and urges investigation by authorities.
Clipping
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Gazette.
WINCHESTER:
SATURDAY, Oct. 20th, 1821.
We refer our readers to the article from the Richmond Enquirer, in relation to the conduct of Gen. Jackson, in the case of Col. Callava and Judge Fromentin. The luminous and correct view which Mr. Ritchie has taken of this subject, cannot, we think, fail to satisfy every man, that Gen. Jackson has transcended his powers in an alarming degree. Another article from the Charleston Southern Patriot confirms the opinion hitherto entertained by us, that Judge Fromentin did not, as has been stated, concede that he did not possess the power to interpose between Callava and Jackson. The contrary now appears to be the fact; but admitting for a moment that Fromentin had conceded the point, should that have satisfied the American people? Exercising almost absolute power: powers which have never been entrusted to any other individual in our Country; & possessing also a temper and disposition calculated to awe the most determined into submission, would it have been surprising if Judge Fromentin had been intimidated by the violence of Gen. Jackson's passions, and have acknowledged his error in issuing the writ of Habeas Corpus? We trust that this subject will be investigated by the proper authorities, with that dignity and firmness which its importance merits.
WINCHESTER:
SATURDAY, Oct. 20th, 1821.
We refer our readers to the article from the Richmond Enquirer, in relation to the conduct of Gen. Jackson, in the case of Col. Callava and Judge Fromentin. The luminous and correct view which Mr. Ritchie has taken of this subject, cannot, we think, fail to satisfy every man, that Gen. Jackson has transcended his powers in an alarming degree. Another article from the Charleston Southern Patriot confirms the opinion hitherto entertained by us, that Judge Fromentin did not, as has been stated, concede that he did not possess the power to interpose between Callava and Jackson. The contrary now appears to be the fact; but admitting for a moment that Fromentin had conceded the point, should that have satisfied the American people? Exercising almost absolute power: powers which have never been entrusted to any other individual in our Country; & possessing also a temper and disposition calculated to awe the most determined into submission, would it have been surprising if Judge Fromentin had been intimidated by the violence of Gen. Jackson's passions, and have acknowledged his error in issuing the writ of Habeas Corpus? We trust that this subject will be investigated by the proper authorities, with that dignity and firmness which its importance merits.
What sub-type of article is it?
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Justice
What keywords are associated?
Gen Jackson
Judge Fromentin
Col Callava
Habeas Corpus
Power Transgression
Investigation
What entities or persons were involved?
Gen. Jackson
Col. Callava
Judge Fromentin
Mr. Ritchie
Story Details
Key Persons
Gen. Jackson
Col. Callava
Judge Fromentin
Mr. Ritchie
Event Date
1821
Story Details
Editorial refers to articles criticizing Gen. Jackson's overreach of power in the case involving Col. Callava and Judge Fromentin, notes Judge Fromentin did not concede lack of authority to issue habeas corpus, questions if intimidation influenced any concession, and calls for investigation by authorities.