Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Recorder
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial exposes waste in Virginia's public printing contract, criticizing printer Mr. Jones for overcharging $870 on extra law copies while salaried at $2700 annually, urging the General Assembly to select a cheaper alternative for $900-1100 to save $3000 yearly.
Merged-components note: The table provides a detailed cost breakdown that directly supports and is referenced in the adjacent editorial discussing overcharges and reforms for the public printer position.
OCR Quality
Full Text
| Paper | Dolls |
| Prefwork | 98 |
| Stitching | 30 |
| 24 | |
| Total expense of Jones | |
| Paid by the executive | 152 |
| 870 | |
| Balance in favor of Jones | 718 |
THE
PUBLIC PRINTER.
THE MEMBERS OF THE NEXT
GENERAL ASSEMBLY, or at least such
of them as wish to prevent the waste of public
money, are requested to give an early atten-
tion in the approaching session. One of the
first questions that are to come before them
will be upon the choice of a public printer.
The second will be whether it is proper to
pay two thousand seven hundred dollars per
annum, for a piece of business, that can be done
equally as well for one thousand. It is
very possible that Mr. Jones may endeavour
to get an election smuggled through the house
on the first or second day of the session. This
paragraph is written, therefore, to warn those
members who are anxious to serve their con-
stituents, that they ought to come to town in
time at the first opening of business, in order
to prevent an attempt of that nature; if indeed
any delegate could be supposed to countenance
it.
A memorial will be presented to the assem-
bly on the first day of their meeting, stating
the common printing price for which the du-
ties of a public printer can be performed.
The memorialist will offer to perform the
whole for a given sum, of about nine, or per-
haps eleven hundred dollars. In the Recor-
der of October 20th, we made some remarks
on this subject. They are not entirely correct.
It is said that Jones, for his salary, printed
two thousand eight hundred copies of the laws
of last session. Further information assures us
that Jones printed only two thousand for his
salary. He printed eight hundred and seventy
copies additional; and for these he received
eight hundred and seventy dollars. These ad-
ditional copies, containing each of them fifty
six folio pages, would require twenty-eight
reams of paper. The highest price which
the paper cost him could not be more than
three dollars and a half per ream; or, in
whole, ninety-eight dollars.
Thus Jones received a fraction more than
five dollars and seventy-two cents, instead of
one dollar; just as if you had paid five shillings
and eight-pence half-penny for a loaf of bread,
which was worth only one shilling.
This, to be sure, is a very promising sample
of your executive council. They cost two
thousand pounds a year for salaries; and go-
vernor Monroe is not entrusted with a vote
among these venerable sages. No part of the
blame can, therefore, be attached to the pre-
server of the life of Thomas Paine. He at-
tempted this act of justice and humanity at
the notorious risk of offending those who sent
him to Paris: at the risk of being recalled
from his embassy. Jones was no doubt laugh-
ing within himself at this omission upon our
part, of those eight hundred and seventy dol-
lars. For its extent there is not, and there
cannot be, a viler job, in the whole annals of
corruption. You cannot shut your eyes
against facts like these! Samuel Coleman,
the sub-clerk of this council, thinks it a terrible
crime to tell such facts; and such explana-
tions it is, with John Guerrant, one rea-
son for calling Callender a trai-
tor. A letter for a meagre folio pamphlet
of fifty pages! -- The very sound of
the words is an outrage upon common sense.
The wretched shambling answers that Jones
gives upon this subject demonstrate his con-
sciousness that the ground upon which he stands
is breaking down under him.
Senators and delegates of the assembly of
Virginia! We have been assured by several of
your members that there is not one man of
you who will set his face in defence of those
things. They say that the longer endurance
of such enormities is not possible. They affirm
that the story requires but to be proved in
order to command reformation. You have
only to peruse the public accounts, as they
will be laid before you, and all doubt is at once
extinguished in a burst of conviction. Get a
public printer, if you please. But, in God's
name, let him be paid at the rate by which
other printers are paid. If one is ready to
do the business for nine hundred dollars, for
which you are at present giving twenty-seven
hundred dollars to another, who, by the way
never set a type in his life, can you be simple
enough to cast away eighteen hundred dollars?
It cannot be.
We have formerly stated that the public
printer receives large sums besides his salary
Such were these eight hundred and seven-
ty dollars. The whole saving by a reform can
not be less than THREE THOUSAND
DOLLARS per annum.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Excessive Payments To Public Printer Mr. Jones
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical Of Corruption And Waste In Public Printing Expenditures
Key Figures
Key Arguments