Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 5, 1899
The News & Observer
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
What is this article about?
Editorial urges the Democratic Senate to pass the Stevens anti-trust bill before adjournment, highlighting its unanimous House passage, past failures, and the growing power of trusts controlling trade and products, emphasizing need for stringent state and federal laws.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
THE TRUST BILL—SOME SIGNIFICANT FACTS.
The Stevens anti-trust bill is in the hands of the Senate Judiciary Committee "for careful consideration." The time of adjournment is near at hand. Unless the committee reports the bill tomorrow, killing the emasculating amendments, it will die in the pigeon-hole of that committee or on the calendar. The responsibility of its death ought not to be taken by this Senate after the House has passed it by a practically unanimous vote.
In the Fusion Legislature of 1895 and 1897, Democratic members tried to secure the passage of anti-trust legislation, but the trusts were powerful enough to defeat every effort. This Democratic Senate ought not to adjourn until it has passed the Stevens' act.
We publish elsewhere today an extract from The Outlook on "Trade Combinations," which conveys some idea of the extent to which the trusts of this country control trade. Already during the present year, with but two months gone, the aggregate capitalization of the trusts organized amounts to nearly $250,000,000. There is not left a single factory product that enters into the life of the working class which does not pay toll to the greed of a trust. If "competition is the life of trade," then it must follow that the destruction of competition by the trusts will bring about in time a "dry-rot" in trade which will destroy our commercial life.
We are not of that number who believe that either State or Federal legislation alone can destroy trusts. It cannot be done until both enact stringent legislation and elect men who will leave no stone unturned to enforce the laws. But because action of both is necessary, there is no reason why this Legislature should not redeem its pledges and pass a stringent anti-trust law.
The Stevens anti-trust bill is in the hands of the Senate Judiciary Committee "for careful consideration." The time of adjournment is near at hand. Unless the committee reports the bill tomorrow, killing the emasculating amendments, it will die in the pigeon-hole of that committee or on the calendar. The responsibility of its death ought not to be taken by this Senate after the House has passed it by a practically unanimous vote.
In the Fusion Legislature of 1895 and 1897, Democratic members tried to secure the passage of anti-trust legislation, but the trusts were powerful enough to defeat every effort. This Democratic Senate ought not to adjourn until it has passed the Stevens' act.
We publish elsewhere today an extract from The Outlook on "Trade Combinations," which conveys some idea of the extent to which the trusts of this country control trade. Already during the present year, with but two months gone, the aggregate capitalization of the trusts organized amounts to nearly $250,000,000. There is not left a single factory product that enters into the life of the working class which does not pay toll to the greed of a trust. If "competition is the life of trade," then it must follow that the destruction of competition by the trusts will bring about in time a "dry-rot" in trade which will destroy our commercial life.
We are not of that number who believe that either State or Federal legislation alone can destroy trusts. It cannot be done until both enact stringent legislation and elect men who will leave no stone unturned to enforce the laws. But because action of both is necessary, there is no reason why this Legislature should not redeem its pledges and pass a stringent anti-trust law.
What sub-type of article is it?
Economic Policy
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Anti Trust Bill
Trusts
Legislation
Trade Combinations
Competition
Economic Control
What entities or persons were involved?
Stevens Anti Trust Bill
Senate Judiciary Committee
Fusion Legislature
Democratic Senate
The Outlook
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Support For Stevens Anti Trust Bill
Stance / Tone
Urging Passage Of Stringent Anti Trust Legislation
Key Figures
Stevens Anti Trust Bill
Senate Judiciary Committee
Fusion Legislature
Democratic Senate
The Outlook
Key Arguments
Senate Must Report The Bill Without Emasculating Amendments To Avoid Its Death
House Passed The Bill By Practically Unanimous Vote
Previous Democratic Efforts In 1895 And 1897 Failed Due To Trust Influence
Trusts Have Capitalized Nearly $250,000,000 This Year And Control Factory Products Affecting Working Class
Destruction Of Competition By Trusts Will Lead To Commercial Decline
Both State And Federal Stringent Legislation And Enforcement Are Needed To Combat Trusts